She’s Making Profit Now: Neoliberalism, Ethics, and Feminist Critique

McAuliffe, Jana

doi:10.1353/phi.2020.0001

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is possible to interpret all of these explanations of laughter apolitically, and ‘there remains a persistent suspicion that comic laughter is politically irrelevant or ineffective’ (Willett and Willett 2019, 11). Further, humour is polysemic and it is possible to find in the same work of humour either feminist or antifeminist values; it is in large part the work of the viewer who reads the comedy that creates the difference (McAuliffe 2020, 33). While comic relief in particular is easily targeted as escapist, the subversive comics Willett and Willett read make that extremely difficult.…”

Section: Comedic Catharsis As Feminist Resourcementioning

confidence: 99%

How to feminist affect: Feminist comedy and post-truth politics

McAuliffe

2023

Philosophy & Social Criticism

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Under the shifting epistemic and political norms of post-truth politics, the conditions of feminist solidarity and agency are increasingly threatened. This article argues that feminist humour provides models for affective orientations that sustain feminist work and survival during such periods of political crisis. First, I explore a potential issue post-truth politics poses for feminists: That information overload can lead to truth burn-out that threatens intersectional feminist thinking and action. Next, I explain why comedy is well-suited to help maintain feminist work in the context of post-truth politics. I then present a reading of Sarah Cooper’s skit, ‘How to medical’ to explore Cooper’s work and demonstrate how it operates as parodic political critique. I conclude that the affective stance of a feminist comedian models how feminists can keep surviving in the midst of post-truth crises. Such work shows how oppressive power can be engaged closely enough that deep critiques can be developed but with sufficient affective distance that feminist engagement can be sustained over time, through a multiplicity of crises. Cooper’s engagement can thus be read to generate strategies for how to (effectively) feminist affect under post-truth conditions.

show abstract

Section: Comedic Catharsis As Feminist Resourcementioning

confidence: 99%