2015
DOI: 10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela0138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

She reads, he reads: gender differences and learning through self-help books

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Houle et al ( 34 ) point out that a possible explanation for this preference may be that women express and talk about their feelings more easily. In terms of gender differences, women in our study showed stronger preferences for alternative treatment and self-help literature which is in line with other studies ( 47 , 48 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Houle et al ( 34 ) point out that a possible explanation for this preference may be that women express and talk about their feelings more easily. In terms of gender differences, women in our study showed stronger preferences for alternative treatment and self-help literature which is in line with other studies ( 47 , 48 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For purposes of this article, we focus our analysis exclusively on the forty-five male research participants. Readers wishing further details regarding gender differences in self-help reading, or regarding women reading self-help books, should consult our recently published articles McLean, 2014/2015;McLean and Kapell, 2015). Table 1 provides sociodemographic information about each of the twenty-one interviewees whose responses are cited in this article.…”
Section: Research Methods and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data for this article are drawn from research conducted in 2012 to explore the learning experiences and outcomes involved in reading self-help books relating to career success, interpersonal relationships, or health and well-being. That research has led to a series of publications examining self-help reading as a form of public pedagogy, with implications for a range of topics of interest to adult educators: self-directed learning, life course transitions, generational differences, mental health, and the reproduction of gender identities and inequities (Kapell & McLean, 2014; McLean 2013, 2014, in press; McLean & Kapell, in press; McLean & Vermeylen, 2014; Vermeylen & McLean, 2014). For purposes of the current article, the interviewees from this broader study of self-help reading constitute a sample of adults engaged in forms of learning closely associated with “neoliberal times.” It is important to note that we are not arguing that the experience of self-help reading has caused these research participants to form subjectivities that are relatively more individually autonomous or socially engaged; rather, we are exploring the subjectivities of adult learners who had read at least one self-help book in the year prior to our interviewing them.…”
Section: Research Methods and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%