2009
DOI: 10.1308/003588409x432194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharps Injury Reporting Amongst Surgeons

Abstract: We showed that despite local trust adherence to Department of Health policy, sharps injury reporting rates are inadequate. Further investment into healthcare worker education as well as a facilitation of the process of reporting may be necessary to improve reporting rates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The published literature indicates that healthcare professionals, in particular surgeons, continue to demonstrate poor compliance with universal precautions [8]. However, data on the specifics of which personnel are at greater risk and what practices change the risk in this environment are almost nonexistent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The published literature indicates that healthcare professionals, in particular surgeons, continue to demonstrate poor compliance with universal precautions [8]. However, data on the specifics of which personnel are at greater risk and what practices change the risk in this environment are almost nonexistent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual number of exposures is much higher than those reported/recorded, as many HCW find that the post-exposure protocols interfere with their schedules, or residents and other junior doctors manage their own post-exposure care, rather than reporting it. Non-compliance with needle stick injury protocols is commonest amongst senior surgeons (Adams et al, 2010;Kerr et al, 2009 (Do et al, 2003). Further, six surgeons thought to have seroconverted after occupational exposure did not either have identified index cases, or their pre-exposure status was unknown (CDC., 2000).…”
Section: Universal Precautions In the Operating Roommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most glove perforations (83.3%) had gone unnoticed (Thomas et al, 2001). Bennett et al estimated that double-gloving reduced the size of the blood innoculum in a normal phlebotomy needle to less than 5%, effectively reducing the risk of transmission from 0.3% to 0.009% (Bennet & Howard, 1994;Kerr., 2009). The benefits of double-gloving far outweigh the perceived loss of tactile sensation and dexterity.…”
Section: Universal Precautions In the Operating Roommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Outros autores também encontraram esta resposta e ainda a resposta "falta de tempo" (GANCZAK et al, 2007;KERR et al, 2009;KESSLER et al, 2011;PROCHNOW et al, 2011;QUINN et al, 2009 PROCHNOW et al, 2011;GANCZAK et al, 2007;KESSLER et al, 2011;QUINN et al, 2009 • Dos 352 profissionais acidentados, 48,6% sofreram de duas a cinco exposições no último ano;…”
Section: Coleta De Dadosunclassified