“…Indeed, this inequality for all p≥2 is within a few percent of being an identity, and thus there is little numerical difference between (4.2) and (4.3). The significant difference is that the function of Γ p on the right side of (4.3) is shown to be the best possible in [8] in that for all γ ∈[0, 1], on any "nice" measure space, there are functions f and g for which Γ p (f, g)=γ, and such that equality holds in (4.3). However, even knowing that (4.3) is a non-improvable result for N =2, one does not have a new proof of (4.2) that does not rely on [4,Theorem 1.3].…”