2018
DOI: 10.2469/faj.v74.n1.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharpening the Arithmetic of Active Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Passive portfolios need to deal with securities that are issued or repurchased, reinvest stock dividends and bond coupons, and other events that entail portfolio rebalancing. Since this trading can be costly for passive investors (Pedersen, 2018), we also use investable funds (mutual funds and ETFs) that incur these costs. Table 3 presents the statistics for their monthly returns in local currency during our sample period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive portfolios need to deal with securities that are issued or repurchased, reinvest stock dividends and bond coupons, and other events that entail portfolio rebalancing. Since this trading can be costly for passive investors (Pedersen, 2018), we also use investable funds (mutual funds and ETFs) that incur these costs. Table 3 presents the statistics for their monthly returns in local currency during our sample period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He acknowledges, however, that even a passive investor must trade twice, once to get into the position and once to get out, and these trades can provide an opportunity for active investors to gain from passive investors by providing liquidity (Sharpe (1991, footnote 4)). Second, Pedersen (2018) further points out that the “market” itself changes over time because new companies and shares are added, old shares are repurchased, and companies sometimes delist. Hence, passive investors also need to trade to track the market.…”
Section: Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutions are sophisticated investors. If active investing is even approximately a negative sum game (Sharpe (1991), Pedersen (2018)), why did institutions delegate these assets to active managers? In this study, we analyze the performance of these delegated assets and find that the answer to this question is straightforward: Institutions earned positive alphas on the assets that they delegated to active strategies and they would not have done better managing passive strategies in‐house.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… See Sharpe (1991;Bogle (2005) andFrench (2008) among others. In addition,Pedersen (2018) provides evidence that the theoretical argument about active management being a zero-sum game does not hold in the real world.7 The reduced profitable opportunities are mainly due to increasing market efficiency(Bernstein, 1998;Chordia et al, 2008Chordia et al, , 2011Conrad et al, 2015) and increasing competition among fund managers(Dyck et al, 2013;Pástor et al, 2015;Hoberg et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%