The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00033-012-0272-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharp nonexistence results of prescribed L 2-norm solutions for some class of Schrödinger–Poisson and quasi-linear equations

Abstract: In this paper we study the existence of minimizers forwhere c > 0 is a given parameter. In the range p ∈ [3, 10 3 ] we explicit a threshold value of c > 0 separating existence and non-existence of minimizers. We also derive a non-existence result of critical points of F (u) restricted to S(c) when c > 0 is sufficiently small. Finally, as a byproduct of our approaches, we extend some results of [9] where a constrained minimization problem, associated to a quasilinear equation, is considered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
68
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key points of proving Theorem 1.1 are some established inequalities in Lemma 2.2-2.4. Here, we shall see the difference between (1.1) and the Schrödinger-Poisson equation (see [19]). In the mass-supercritical case p ∈ (4, +∞), the functional I(u) is no longer bounded from below on S(c) (Lemma 2.5), the minimization method on S r (c) used in [10] does not work.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The key points of proving Theorem 1.1 are some established inequalities in Lemma 2.2-2.4. Here, we shall see the difference between (1.1) and the Schrödinger-Poisson equation (see [19]). In the mass-supercritical case p ∈ (4, +∞), the functional I(u) is no longer bounded from below on S(c) (Lemma 2.5), the minimization method on S r (c) used in [10] does not work.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The nonlocal term causes some mathematical difficulties that make the study of (1.1) more interesting. As we shall see, (1.1) is also different from the Schrödinger-Poisson equation (see [6,19,28]), which is another problem exhibiting the competition between local and nonlocal terms. We point out that (1.1) arises from seeking the standing wave solutions to the following nonlinear Schrödinger equations with the gauge field:…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1,2,[6][7][8]13,17,20,22,26]. In [7,8,13], for p in some ranges and c > 0, by using the concentration-compactness method of Lions [18,19], the authors obtained the minimizers oñ…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fixed λ, the authors of [9][10][11] obtained weak solutions to (1.1) by looking for critical points of the C 1 functional Recently, normalized solutions to elliptic equations attract much attention of researchers, see e.g. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. In [23], Jeanjean considered the following semi-linear Schrödinger equation:…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%