2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharp interface immersed boundary methods and their application to vortex-induced vibration of a cylinder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While such an interpolation scheme can lead to spurious oscillations in the pressure field that the distributed-force immersed-boundary scheme does not suffer from, the interpolation has the advantage of maintaining a sharp representation of the boundary, which can be important for multiple bodies in proximity. It should be noted that a recent study has shown that these spurious oscillations pose no problem for fluid-structure problems as long as the resolution of the mesh is adequate (Griffith & Leontini 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While such an interpolation scheme can lead to spurious oscillations in the pressure field that the distributed-force immersed-boundary scheme does not suffer from, the interpolation has the advantage of maintaining a sharp representation of the boundary, which can be important for multiple bodies in proximity. It should be noted that a recent study has shown that these spurious oscillations pose no problem for fluid-structure problems as long as the resolution of the mesh is adequate (Griffith & Leontini 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic method follows closely that outlined in Mittal et al (2008), and further details of the implementation used here for fluid-structure interaction problems is provided in (Griffith & Leontini 2017). A concise description of the method is provided below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A drawback that exists in all sharp interface IBM is known as the spurious pressure oscillation near the boundary. This adverse effect is more highlighted in cases where the boundary is allowed to move in the fluid domain . The adverse pressure oscillation occurs only in the sharp interface IBM as the spurious pressure oscillations are diminished in the diffused‐interface IBM, as a result of the smoothed and spread forcing term.…”
Section: Application Of the Curvib‐mls Methods To Canonical Flow Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seo and Mittal identified the error as the violation of the geometric conservation law, due to appearance of fresh/dead nodes, and local changes in the effective geometry of immersed body, which introduces local mass sources/sinks in the vicinity of the immersed body. Many remedies have been proposed to this adverse effect but none could completely eliminate the inherent pressure oscillation …”
Section: Application Of the Curvib‐mls Methods To Canonical Flow Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%