2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2014.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharp Forelli–Rudin estimates and the norm of the Bergman projection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the conjecture agrees with the already established value for the norm of the Riesz projection due to Hollenbeck and Verbitsky [10]. However, very recently, in [13], the first author of the present paper obtained P p ≥ Γ(2/p)Γ(2/q), which disproves (1.2). However, this motivated the following conjecture.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the conjecture agrees with the already established value for the norm of the Riesz projection due to Hollenbeck and Verbitsky [10]. However, very recently, in [13], the first author of the present paper obtained P p ≥ Γ(2/p)Γ(2/q), which disproves (1.2). However, this motivated the following conjecture.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…which we conjecture to be true. When α = 0, we then recover the conjecture from [13]. The lower bound is obtained by using a suitable choice of test functions formed from Bergman-type kernels along with some interpolation, manipulation of the classical Forelli-Rudin estimates [7], and a Hausdorff-Young type inequality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Since then, several nice works have been done in the direction of the sharp estimate of Bergman type operators, such as [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12, Proposition 1.4.10]), we shall call the above result the Forelli-Rudin type estimates on the real ball. The purpose of this note is to present a sharp version of these estimates, which can also be viewed as an analogue of [8,Theorem 1.3] in the setting of the unit real ball. More precisely, our main results are as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%