2019
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2019.2920375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharp Analytical Capacity Upper Bounds for Sticky and Related Channels

Abstract: We study natural examples of binary channels with synchronization errors. These include the duplication channel, which independently outputs a given bit once or twice, and geometric channels that repeat a given bit according to a geometric rule, with or without the possibility of bit deletion. We apply the general framework of Cheraghchi (STOC 2018) to obtain sharp analytical upper bounds on the capacity of these channels. Previously, upper bounds were known via numerical computations involving the computation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Thus far, this is the only non-trivial capacity upper bound for any repeat channel in the "many replications" regime. [75] beats the numerical upper bound from [60].…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4 Thus far, this is the only non-trivial capacity upper bound for any repeat channel in the "many replications" regime. [75] beats the numerical upper bound from [60].…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Cheraghchi and Ribeiro [75], building on techniques from [68], derived tight analytical capacity upper bounds for the duplication and geometric sticky channels. As before, these bounds are maximums of concave smooth functions over [0, 1], and hence can be computed efficiently to any desired accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…which is seen by considering which of the blocks from B q,ℓ,r is the first block in each particular codeword of C q,ℓ,r (n). The theorem is then obtained by a standard application of 2 The function v 2,1,1 (x) (in fact, the related function…”
Section: Zero-error Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%