2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-5221-7_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shark Smell Optimization (SSO) Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed model for secured CHS in IoT using SADO-BM was done in MATLAB 2020a. Here, the performance of the SADO-BM scheme was proven over Cat Swarm Optimization (CSO) [ 19 ], FF Firefly (FF) [ 2 ], Shark Smell Optimization (SSO) [ 20 ], Poor Rich Optimization (PRO) [ 21 ], Hunger Games Optimizer (HGS) [ 22 ], Bald Eagle Search (BES) [ 23 ], Black Widow Optimization (BWO) [ 24 ], Fuzzy + Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO) [ 25 ], Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) + Self-Adaptive Jellyfish Search Optimizer (SA-JSO) [ 26 ], and Dingo Optimizer (DOX) [ 18 ] on wide-ranging metrics like delay, throughput, and so on. In addition, Table 3 presents the simulation parameters; this work considered 100, 250, 750, and 1000 nodes with 500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 rounds.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model for secured CHS in IoT using SADO-BM was done in MATLAB 2020a. Here, the performance of the SADO-BM scheme was proven over Cat Swarm Optimization (CSO) [ 19 ], FF Firefly (FF) [ 2 ], Shark Smell Optimization (SSO) [ 20 ], Poor Rich Optimization (PRO) [ 21 ], Hunger Games Optimizer (HGS) [ 22 ], Bald Eagle Search (BES) [ 23 ], Black Widow Optimization (BWO) [ 24 ], Fuzzy + Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO) [ 25 ], Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) + Self-Adaptive Jellyfish Search Optimizer (SA-JSO) [ 26 ], and Dingo Optimizer (DOX) [ 18 ] on wide-ranging metrics like delay, throughput, and so on. In addition, Table 3 presents the simulation parameters; this work considered 100, 250, 750, and 1000 nodes with 500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 rounds.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presented IDS in the cloud with the RBF‐NN + HMPRO scheme was implemented in PYTHON and the outcomes were confirmed. Furthermore, the performance of the presented RBF‐NN + HMPRO scheme was computed over the conventional schemes such as SVM, 56 RF, 57 LSTM, 58 convolutional neural network (CNN), 59 butterfly migration‐monarch search algorithm (BM‐MSA), 60 TEHO‐DBN, 61 RBF‐NN, 49 RBF‐NN + WOA, 62 RBF‐NN + SSO, 63 RBF‐NN + BOA, 64 and RBF‐NN + PRO, 50 correspondingly. In addition, the datasets were collected from References 65,66.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although extant EFO 37 includes varied improvements, it endures specified limits regarding convergence rate and speed. To prevail over the disadvantages of traditional EFO, the theory of SSO 38 is combined with it to set up a new algorithm termed as SSI‐EHO. Hybrid optimization approaches are much more proficient for specified searching issues 27,39‐41…”
Section: Proposed Ssi‐eho Based Optimization For Optimal Mpa Designmentioning
confidence: 99%