2007
DOI: 10.18848/1447-9532/cgp/v07i04/39433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharing the Story: Canadian First Nations and Traveller Community Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to higher mortality, morbidity rates are also higher than the general population for both physical and mental health [42]. Factors contributing to higher levels of mental health include enforced cultural change, marginalisation and discrimination within these communities [43], which in turn can lead to increased alcohol and substance abuse. Despite higher levels of morbidity and mortality, evidence also exists that these communities experience difficulties accessing health care [44] despite access to quality healthcare being a human right [2].…”
Section: Public Health Issues and Benefits Of Identification As Indigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to higher mortality, morbidity rates are also higher than the general population for both physical and mental health [42]. Factors contributing to higher levels of mental health include enforced cultural change, marginalisation and discrimination within these communities [43], which in turn can lead to increased alcohol and substance abuse. Despite higher levels of morbidity and mortality, evidence also exists that these communities experience difficulties accessing health care [44] despite access to quality healthcare being a human right [2].…”
Section: Public Health Issues and Benefits Of Identification As Indigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of public policy for Aboriginal Peoples in Canada and Travellers in Ireland (see for example Lewis & May, 2007) does not involve comparing the two groups that are indigenous to their respective countries; rather, it involves comparing the engagement of these Indigenous Peoples with their respective governments and with the efficacy of the voluntary sector in defining and achieving their policy needs. The comparison of two specific cases broadens our ability to consider certain phenomena in each instance, specifically, the accommodation of issues and interests of urban Aboriginal Peoples and Travellers and the availability of opportunities for these groups to secure cultural continuity.…”
Section: Indigenous Inclusion In Public Policy: a Comparison Of Urbanmentioning
confidence: 99%