Sharing the space of the creature: Intersubjectivity as a lens toward mutual human–wildlife dignity

Abstract

Human–wildlife coexistence is critical for sustainable and healthy ecosystems as well as to prevent human and wildlife suffering. In this paper, an intersubjective approach to human–wildlife interactions is proposed as a lens toward human decentering and emergent mutual evolution. The thesis is developed through a secondary data analysis of a research study on wildlife care and philosophical analysis using the work of Bernard Lonergan and Edmund Husserl. The study was conducted using the theory of transcendent pluralism, which is grounded in human and ecological dignity, including the dignity of beyond‐human beings. Deeper interpretation of the original data suggests that human–wildlife interactions are mutually conscious, embodied, and hold spatial–temporal dimensions. The affective realm is an integral dimension of human–wildlife intersubjectivity. These findings inform an approach toward human–wildlife relations in which human persons and the beyond‐human multitude can all flourish in dignity.

The feasibility of wildlife immersion experiences for Veterans with PTSD

“…The overlapping human-animal patterns in this diagram signify the occurrence of an interaction. Human-wildlife interactions include spatial, temporal, and mutually conscious dimensions ( 31 ). There are varying forms of human-wildlife interaction including physical (such as providing hands-on care) or conscious awareness (such as observation).…”

“…Spatial territory is a core need for wildlife and must be respected during AAI to avoid animal stress and maintain human safety. Engagement in shared wildlife space requires attentiveness to one’s own spatial relationship with the animal ( 22 , 31 ). The study intervention was guided by experts at each location so that appropriate boundaries, protocols, and assessment for animal stress were maintained.…”