2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharing the filmic experience - The physiology of socio-emotional processes in the cinema

Abstract: As we identify with characters on screen, we simulate their emotions and thoughts. This is accompanied by physiological changes such as galvanic skin response (GSR), an indicator for emotional arousal, and respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), referring to vagal activity. We investigated whether the presence of a cinema audience affects these psychophysiological processes. The study was conducted in a real cinema in Berlin. Participants came twice to watch previously rated emotional film scenes eliciting amuseme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our view, it is the processing of the common stimulus, and not the co-presence in the same physical space, that causes the synchronization of the heart rate fluctuations. We predict that many results obtained with live performances (Konvalinka et al, 2011;Palumbo et al, 2017;Kaltwasser et al, 2019) or in-person interactions (Cohen et al, 2018) could be recovered with asynchronous playback of the same experience recorded with video. Evidently the experience may be less powerful than live in-person experiences (Golland et al, 2015), but the modulating factors of rela- tionships, emotions, or empathy may still prevail in this virtual context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our view, it is the processing of the common stimulus, and not the co-presence in the same physical space, that causes the synchronization of the heart rate fluctuations. We predict that many results obtained with live performances (Konvalinka et al, 2011;Palumbo et al, 2017;Kaltwasser et al, 2019) or in-person interactions (Cohen et al, 2018) could be recovered with asynchronous playback of the same experience recorded with video. Evidently the experience may be less powerful than live in-person experiences (Golland et al, 2015), but the modulating factors of rela- tionships, emotions, or empathy may still prevail in this virtual context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This literature emphasizes physical interaction and social relationships as the factors driving this synchronization. Even in the context of music, theater, or film, the emphasis is on the concurrent and shared experience of an audience that synchronizes heart rate to one another (Konvalinka et al, 2011;Bernardi et al, 2017;Kaltwasser et al, 2019;Ardizzi et al, 2020). Here, we have emphasized that it is the stimulus that synchronizes HR, or more precisely, a similar processing of a common stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in the context of music, theater, or film, the emphasis is on the concurrent and shared experience of an audience that synchronizes heart rate to oneanother. 38,39,56,57 Here we have emphasized instead that it is the stimulus that synchronizes HR, or more precisely, a similar processing of a common stimulus. There is no need for individuals to directly interact, be related to one another or perceive the stimulus together at the same time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On this view, we can empathize with a character in a film by simulating her actions and emotions. This is evidenced by physiological changes such as galvanic skin response (GSR), which indicates emotional arousal (see Kaltwasser 2018). Murray Smith (2017) picks up on this account and on Gallese's notion of embodied simulation, as a way to explain a viewer's empathy with a character.…”
Section: Acting and Acting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%