2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11113-018-9497-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharing Parental Leave Among Dual-Earner Couples in Canada: Does Reserved Paternity Leave Make a Difference?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Household income is measured in categories following the recent Canadian research (Margolis et al, ): low income (<$30,000, reference category), middle income ($30,000–$79,999), high income ($80,000 or more), and missing responses (12% of cases). Fathers' educational attainment (less than high school, reference category; high school graduate; college diploma; university graduate) is positively associated with both their likelihood of taking leave (Mayer & Le Bourdais, ) and being involved fathers (Sayer, Bianchi, & Robinson, ). In addition to these covariates, I include fathers' age, immigrant status (Canadian born, reference category; born outside of Canada), the number of own household children, and whether the diary day was conducted on a weekday (reference category) or a weekend (Sayer et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Household income is measured in categories following the recent Canadian research (Margolis et al, ): low income (<$30,000, reference category), middle income ($30,000–$79,999), high income ($80,000 or more), and missing responses (12% of cases). Fathers' educational attainment (less than high school, reference category; high school graduate; college diploma; university graduate) is positively associated with both their likelihood of taking leave (Mayer & Le Bourdais, ) and being involved fathers (Sayer, Bianchi, & Robinson, ). In addition to these covariates, I include fathers' age, immigrant status (Canadian born, reference category; born outside of Canada), the number of own household children, and whether the diary day was conducted on a weekday (reference category) or a weekend (Sayer et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reform increased leave uptake in Quebec from 21% of prereform eligible fathers to nearly 80% pos‐reform—a causal jump of 250% (Patnaik, )—whereas in the rest of Canada, leave uptake of fathers only changed from 11% to 13% (Statistics Canada, ). Although the duration of leaves also increased by 3 weeks, or 150% over the prereform average (Patnaik, ), on average, Quebec fathers limit their leave to the reserved period of 5 weeks (Mayer & Le Bourdais, ). Although Patnaik () found that the policy reform had significant, positive effects on the gendered division of paid work and housework, it did not have a direct effect on fathers' engaged child‐care time.…”
Section: The Case Of Quebec and Canadamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A successful example can be found in Quebec, where in 2006 the government offered a separate paternity leave policy distinct from the policy in the rest of Canada. Quebec increased the wage replacement rate from 55% to 75% and introduced three weeks of leave for fathers only (commonly known as the father's quota or “daddy quota”) (Freeman, 2008; Mayer and Le Bourdais, 2019). This change increased fathers’ uptake of parental leave to 80%, compared to 50% in the rest of Canada (Mayer and Le Bourdais, 2019).…”
Section: The Problem: Ineffective Policy An Unreceptive Socio-culturmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quebec increased the wage replacement rate from 55% to 75% and introduced three weeks of leave for fathers only (commonly known as the father's quota or “daddy quota”) (Freeman, 2008; Mayer and Le Bourdais, 2019). This change increased fathers’ uptake of parental leave to 80%, compared to 50% in the rest of Canada (Mayer and Le Bourdais, 2019). This shows how a targeted intervention can influence individual behaviour (the micro level) by changing policy (the macro level) in an effective, measurable, and results-driven way.…”
Section: The Problem: Ineffective Policy An Unreceptive Socio-culturmentioning
confidence: 99%