2010 Second International Conference on Mobile, Hybrid, and on-Line Learning 2010
DOI: 10.1109/elml.2010.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharing Educational Knowledge and Best Practices in Edu-sharing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biggs (1999) refers this as the 'blame-the-student' theory of teaching. According to Kramer et al (2010), to promote collaborative learning, educators have to create specific teaching-learning processes within particular learning set ups supported by educational media-technology. Faculty members and institutions discern the need to store the intellectual asset produced by faculty in the course of preparing their lectures and make it available for students and colleagues.…”
Section: Knowledge Management Concepts In Learning and Teaching Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biggs (1999) refers this as the 'blame-the-student' theory of teaching. According to Kramer et al (2010), to promote collaborative learning, educators have to create specific teaching-learning processes within particular learning set ups supported by educational media-technology. Faculty members and institutions discern the need to store the intellectual asset produced by faculty in the course of preparing their lectures and make it available for students and colleagues.…”
Section: Knowledge Management Concepts In Learning and Teaching Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many mechanism of knowledge sharing technology such as telephone, email, web conferencing, short messaging software, web sites, virtual community sites, email distribution lists, web forums, online knowledge repository and others [28]. Second, Learning Object Repository (LOR) requirements are seen as crucial in sharing learning content either internally or across the education institutions [29]. By using LOR it can stimulate the activity of archiving, sharing, collaboration and provide substantial support in learning [30].…”
Section: Technical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LOR should be involved in the TVET environment to create smart partnerships among TVET institutions. There are four (4) characteristics of LOR in knowledge sharing that should be considered, namely interoperability [29], accessibility [31]- [38], reusability [31], [34]- [36] and usability [31], [35], [36], [39]. These characteristics facilitate access of new knowledge that is more widespread, accessible by different potential users, can be reused for other purposes, as well as easy to be learned and understand when rarely used.…”
Section: Multiple Regression Coefficients Significance Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, a parallel subgroup designed and implemented new methods and tools for effective content creation based on predefined templates, and collected and evolved sample content to best practice examples (cf. Krämer & Han, 2009; Krämer, Klebl & Zobel, 2010). A further subgroup codified widely accepted learning scenarios in the form of content‐free didactic scenario templates and made them available in the portal.…”
Section: Review Of Campus Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, some sections of the course remained in a self‐study mode, others were designed as web lecture, case study and project‐based learning (cf. Krämer et al ., 2010). However, for both school teachers and academic lecturers, the creation of scenario templates remains a difficult and complex task since these educational practitioners tend to think in fully contextualised scenarios.…”
Section: Levels Of Contextualisation: Principles and Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%