Sharing but caring: Location based mobile applications (LBMA) and privacy protection motivation

Rodríguez-Priego, Nuria; Porcu, Lucía; Kitchen, Philip J.

doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.022

Cited by 18 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Privacy protection has been extensively studied in the scientific literature ( Rodríguez-Priego et al, 2022 ). Thus, the concept of privacy has been classified into different types, distinguishing between privacy referred to the social, to the psychological and to the physical spheres respectively, and information privacy, among others ( Burgoon, 1982 ; Clarke, 1999 ; Smith et al, 2011 ; Hallam and Zanella, 2017 ).…”

Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceived customer care and privacy protection behavior: The mediating role of trust in self-disclosure

Nuria

Porcu

Peña

et al. 2023

Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceived customer care and privacy protection behavior: The mediating role of trust in self-disclosure

Nuria

Porcu

Peña

et al. 2023

Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Accordingly, we posit that, just as perceived control seems to enhance self-enhancement in players of offline games, it should do so for e-sports players. Thus: H 3 : E-sports players’ perceived control positively moderates the relationship between sensation-seeking and self-enhancement, with higher levels of perceived control leading to higher self-enhancement. Finally, almost any kind of digital interaction implies that consumers provide personal information, potentially raising privacy concerns (Pizzi and Scarpi 2020; Rodríguez-Priego, Porcu, and Kitchen 2022). Privacy is a key issue wherever digital technologies are involved (Scarpi, Pizzi, and Matta 2022), and e-sports are no exception.…”

Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, almost any kind of digital interaction implies that consumers provide personal information, potentially raising privacy concerns (Pizzi and Scarpi 2020;Rodríguez-Priego, Porcu, and Kitchen 2022). Privacy is a key issue wherever digital technologies are involved (Scarpi, Pizzi, and Matta 2022), and e-sports are no exception.…”

Section: The Role Of Perceived Control and Privacy Perceptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

It’s Not Just a Game: Virtual Edgework and Subjective Well-Being in E-Sports

Raggiotto¹,

Scarpi²

2022

Journal of Interactive Marketing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The authors investigate subjective well-being in the context of e-sports (competitive video games). They adopt the theoretical lenses of virtual edgework theory, a recent adaptation of edgework theory from physical to digital contexts. Sports have long been used as a tool to improve subjective well-being. The research question is whether e-sports lead to well-being, as their physical sport counterparts do, and through what psychological mechanisms. The authors answer through a conceptual model of moderated mediation tested on hundreds of e-sports players. They also address the role of privacy concerns, as e-sports pose several potential threats to players’ privacy that could hinder players’ achievement of well-being. Findings suggest that virtual edgework provides a useful theoretical perspective for understanding consumers’ behavior in digital environments. They also show that e-sports can lead to well-being by achieving feelings of self-enhancement under the positive moderation of perceived control over the digital environment and the negative moderation of privacy concerns.

show abstract

“…Similarly, this willingness is affected by the perception that consumers have of the locus of control from external (i.e., retailers) to internal (i.e., personal choice if sharing or not) (Schmidt et al, 2020). Accordingly, recent research has demonstrated that when consumers feel that companies respect their privacy, they are more willing to share personal information and interact with digital technologies (Rodríguez-Priego et al, 2022).…”

Section: Information Disclosure and Privacy Perspectivementioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, inquiries into personal data are often perceived by consumers as a violation of privacy (Martin & Murphy, 2017). The growing concern about privacy intrusion makes consumers reluctant to disclose personal information with retailers and third parties (Aiello et al, 2020; Rodríguez‐Priego et al, 2022; Wanjugu et al, 2022).…”

Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Foundationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gratifications in change of privacy? The response of four consumers' generational cohorts toward facial recognition technology in retail settings

Pantano

Vannucci

Marikyan

2022

J of Consumer Behaviour

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

New technologies enable retailers to collect large amounts of information about consumers, which might lead to ethical issues and risks of individuals' privacy loss. However, consumers might choose to disclose information to retailers when they perceive that the information would generate more benefits for themselves rather than for the retailer. Since little research has been done to explain the role of age in disclosing personal information to third parties, the present study investigates the difference in the perception of one's own control when it comes to the usage of privacy-threatening technology depending on respondents' age. Drawing upon uses and gratification theory, the present study explores the response of consumers from four generational cohorts towards the facial recognition technology in retailing.Results reveal that the locus of control over information collected by the technology is neither related to the age of consumers nor to their knowledge of a specific technology used to collect their personal data. Instead, consumers' expected gratifications (in terms of economic and utilitarian) vary across different age groups. Implications for practitioners are discussed.

show abstract

Sharing but caring: Location based mobile applications (LBMA) and privacy protection motivation

Cited by 18 publications

References 56 publications

Perceived customer care and privacy protection behavior: The mediating role of trust in self-disclosure

Perceived customer care and privacy protection behavior: The mediating role of trust in self-disclosure

It’s Not Just a Game: Virtual Edgework and Subjective Well-Being in E-Sports

Gratifications in change of privacy? The response of four consumers' generational cohorts toward facial recognition technology in retail settings

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About