2011
DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwq033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shareholder value versus stakeholder values: CSR and financialization in global food firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CSR, understood as the business practices and commitments with a view toward sustainability, shows widespread behavior patterns worldwide, whose development and evolution vary substantially according to the institutional pressures that characterize the environment in which the companies operate (Amor‐Esteban et al, ; Esteban et al, ; Jones & Nisbet, ). These evolutionary differences of CSR are due to the fact that the institutional environment in which the firm operates establishes a series of opportunities and barriers around these business decisions associated with the specific expectations of the actors and the current standards of behavior in the society in which it acts (Campbell, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSR, understood as the business practices and commitments with a view toward sustainability, shows widespread behavior patterns worldwide, whose development and evolution vary substantially according to the institutional pressures that characterize the environment in which the companies operate (Amor‐Esteban et al, ; Esteban et al, ; Jones & Nisbet, ). These evolutionary differences of CSR are due to the fact that the institutional environment in which the firm operates establishes a series of opportunities and barriers around these business decisions associated with the specific expectations of the actors and the current standards of behavior in the society in which it acts (Campbell, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ahlstrand, 2010;McMahon, 1999). Thus, corporate social responsibility may be a business strategy for reducing the effect of reputational damage on the corporate brand image (Jones & Nisbet, 2011). The review also reveals other ways of perceiving power relations.…”
Section: Csr Power and Reputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, business strategies of companies that are not assuming social responsibility are also made visible. Business strategies shaped by the financialized approach to shareholder value means a mismatch between treating CSR as a business strategy and, on the other hand, employees as stakeholders (Jones & Nisbet, 2011). In these cases, the corporate brand image and reputation are prioritized instead of trying to achieve long-term sustainable operations and stakeholder partnerships, according to Jones and Nispet.…”
Section: Csr and Business Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this perspective, Jones & Nisbet (2011) emphasized that business is under pressure from their stakeholders to report its CSR activities because these parties want to protect their long term interests in the firm. Thus, reporting firm's CSR activities is a major element that can be engaged by the firm to manage the stakeholder in order to gain their support and approval.…”
Section: How Do Firms Benefit?mentioning
confidence: 99%