2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00799-012-0098-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SharedCanvas: a collaborative model for digital facsimiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This domain is a particularly challenging one for the development of an annotation system, because the actual data of the objects potentially change over time at the source [in contrast to, say, archival documents or published literature, as e.g. dealt with in SharedCanvas ( 11 )].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This domain is a particularly challenging one for the development of an annotation system, because the actual data of the objects potentially change over time at the source [in contrast to, say, archival documents or published literature, as e.g. dealt with in SharedCanvas ( 11 )].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Morphbank annotation tool ( 9 ) also allows users the creation of structured annotations to biological specimens, it is restricted to the Morphbank system and does not provide annotations of record data from external resources or data providers. This topic is addressed by the annotation tool SharedCanvas ( 10 ), which facilitates the interoperability of repositories of culturally important handwritten documents ( 11 ) by allowing to describe the interrelationships of resources like texts or images, but SharedConvas does not allow for simultaneous structured annotations. To enable this functionality for our current use case ‘specimen data’, data portals would be required to add e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the focus within IIIF was first in the dissemination of two-dimensional images and then audiovisual resources in a subsequent phase, there have been discussions and experiments for many years to expand the so-called Shared Canvas [4,36] or transform it into a space that can accommodate 3D objects. It is one of the purposes of the IIIF 3D Technical Specification Group 19 to specify a future Presentation API or an extension that can standardize this new framework that can display and annotate -which would be compliant to the Web Annotation Data Model as well [37] -as well as combine 3D resources 19 https://iiif.io/community/groups/3d/tsg/…”
Section: Data Interoperability Analysis and Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a tool that neatly interacts with a storage repository would be useful, for facilitating permanent storage and sharing of texts and links. The SharedCanvas project [26] provides an online GUI-based environment for representing a manuscript visually using images. Manuscript pages can be annotated directly in the SharedCanvas environment using a 'point-and-click' approach to freely enter annotations of interest, which are stored in Open Annotation 5 format.…”
Section: The Text Encoding Initiative (Tei)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be contrasted with an alternative model that allows links to be made between two (or more) pages, with the information on that type of link also being recorded. Also, SharedCanvas targets scenarios where information on the manuscript is mostly available through images rather than transcriptions, hence "the focus [of SharedCanvas] is on the relationships between text and image" [26]. In situations where images are unavailable or unobtainable (for example if the digitisation process may damage an ancient document), or alternatively where the text has already been transcribed or is the main focus of interest, SharedCanvas becomes less appropriate.…”
Section: The Text Encoding Initiative (Tei)mentioning
confidence: 99%