2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.crimmu.2021.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shared inflammatory and skin-specific gene signatures reveal common drivers of discoid lupus erythematosus in canines, humans and mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(69 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparative analysis of canine CLE cases with human and mouse CLE revealed significant overlapping genes, supporting the conservation of inflammatory signatures across species. We previously published a similar frequency of DEG overlap in discoid lupus, which shares many DEGs with the complex CLE cases presented here (18). Of note, the clinical and histopathological features observed in CLE case 3 led us to consider the mucocutaneous variant of chronic CLE, as the dog experienced recurrent mucoulcerative lesions and a pattern of interface dermatitis mostly involving the hair follicles, similar to what has been previously observed in reported CLE cases (55).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Comparative analysis of canine CLE cases with human and mouse CLE revealed significant overlapping genes, supporting the conservation of inflammatory signatures across species. We previously published a similar frequency of DEG overlap in discoid lupus, which shares many DEGs with the complex CLE cases presented here (18). Of note, the clinical and histopathological features observed in CLE case 3 led us to consider the mucocutaneous variant of chronic CLE, as the dog experienced recurrent mucoulcerative lesions and a pattern of interface dermatitis mostly involving the hair follicles, similar to what has been previously observed in reported CLE cases (55).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We chose NanoString technology to analyze RNA from these FFPE samples because the technology works well for fragmented RNA and avoids amplification, which could introduce a data acquisition bias ( 29 ). To ascertain whether the cases presented here aligned with cases with confirmed diagnoses, we performed hierarchical clustering using ClustVis with GSE160260 [canine DLE; dataset originally published in Garelli et al ( 18 )] and GSE171079 [canine pemphigus including pemphigus erythematosus; dataset originally published in Raef et al ( 20 )]. Hierarchical clustering of gene expression for the whole panel differentiates between healthy controls and all cases, with a significant overlap between DLE and the cases presented here ( Supplementary Figures 1A,B ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations