1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.1998.tb00809.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shared History and Its Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows the expected upper limits calculated at the 90% confidence level (CL) for production of charge Z = −1 and Z = −2 strangelets in 10% central heavy ion collisions. These represent the best limits in the world to date [21] and are about (averaged over all masses) 1 × 10 −8 and 4 × 10 −9 for charge Z = −1 and Z = −2, respectively.…”
Section: Strangeletsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 3 shows the expected upper limits calculated at the 90% confidence level (CL) for production of charge Z = −1 and Z = −2 strangelets in 10% central heavy ion collisions. These represent the best limits in the world to date [21] and are about (averaged over all masses) 1 × 10 −8 and 4 × 10 −9 for charge Z = −1 and Z = −2, respectively.…”
Section: Strangeletsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The final sensitivities from E864 will be further enhanced by combining the results of this data set (taken at −0.75 T) with those from the +1.5 T data set taken during the same running period. These limits will likely be the ultimate results for negatively charged strangelet searches at the AGS [21].…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 97%