Shared decision making in the Netherlands, is the time ripe for nationwide, structural implementation?

Weijden, Trudy van der; Veenendaal, Haske van; Drenthen, Ton; Versluijs, Martine M.; Stalmeier, Peep F. M.; Loon, Marije Koelewijn-van; Stiggelbout, Anne M.; Timmermans, Daniëlle R. M.

doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.005

Cited by 29 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The structural elements of shared decision making were expected to facilitate discussing patients' health problems, expectations and preferences as well as the available evidence and pro/cons of CAM. Dutch GPs were already familiar with this concept since implementation of shared decision making in clinical practice is strongly promoted in the Netherlands [34,35]. Patients also wanted time to discuss CAM use and referral with their GP.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pragmatic Model for Integrating Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Primary Care Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

Jong¹,

Busch²

2016

Primary Health Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pragmatic Model for Integrating Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Primary Care Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

Jong¹,

Busch²

2016

Primary Health Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…20,21 Doelstellingen van dit platform zijn het realiseren van een maximale toepassing van gedeelde besluitvorming in de zorgpraktijk en het vergroten van de aandacht voor gedeelde besluitvorming in kwaliteitsstandaarden en in onderwijs. Ook richt het platform zich op maximaal gebruik en vindbaarheid van valide keuzehulpen en instrumenten ter ondersteuning van de gedeelde besluitvorming.…”

Section: Platform Gedeelde Besluitvormingunclassified

Samen beslissen is beter

Veenendaal¹,

Voogdt-Pruis²,

Raats³

2015

TIJD. PRAKT.ONDERST.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…3 9 In the Netherlands, the healthcare system has been reformed to promote patient-centred care, and various SDM research projects are underway. 10 Despite proven benefits in controlled contexts, widespread adoption of SDM and related interventions is rare in routine clinical practice. 3 11 Various barriers to the implementation of SDM have been identified.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing medical student knowledge and attitudes about shared decision making across the curriculum: protocol for an international online survey and stakeholder analysis

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionShared decision making (SDM) is a goal of modern medicine; however, it is not currently embedded in routine care. Barriers include cliniciansâ€™ attitudes, lack of knowledge and training and time constraints. Our goal is to support the development and delivery of a robust SDM curriculum in medical education. Our objective is to assess undergraduate medical studentsâ€™ knowledge of and attitudes towards SDM in four countries.Methods and analysisThe first phase of the study involves a web-based cross-sectional survey of undergraduate medical students from all years in selected schools across the United States (US), Canada and undergraduate and graduate students in the Netherlands. In the United Kingdom (UK), the survey will be circulated to all medical schools through the UK Medical School Council. We will sample students equally in all years of training and assess attitudes towards SDM, knowledge of SDM and participation in related training. Medical students of ages 18 years and older in the four countries will be eligible. The second phase of the study will involve semistructured interviews with a subset of students from phase 1 and a convenience sample of medical school curriculum experts or stakeholders. Data will be analysed using multivariable analysis in phase 1 and thematic content analysis in phase 2. Method, data source and investigator triangulation will be performed. Online survey data will be reported according to the Checklist for Reporting the Results of Internet E-Surveys. We will use the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research for all qualitative data.Ethics and disseminationThe study has been approved for dissemination in the US, the Netherlands, Canada and the UK. The study is voluntary with an informed consent process. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will help inform the inclusion of SDM-specific curriculum in medical education worldwide.

show abstract

Shared decision making in the Netherlands, is the time ripe for nationwide, structural implementation?

Cited by 29 publications

References 13 publications

Pragmatic Model for Integrating Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Primary Care Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

Pragmatic Model for Integrating Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Primary Care Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

Samen beslissen is beter

Assessing medical student knowledge and attitudes about shared decision making across the curriculum: protocol for an international online survey and stakeholder analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About