2004
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-835265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shared Decision Making

Abstract: Most patients favour the concept of SDM. The communication skills necessary for this process are to be promoted and extended. Research on patients' preferences and their participation in health care reform should be intensified. Academic and continuous medical education should focus on knowledge transfer to patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
3
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially in the context of serious or life‐threatening illness, shared decision making (SDM) has been shown to be useful, when different therapy options exist with different benefits and risks (10). Furthermore, SDM is considered to be useful if outcomes are uncertain (10). The patient’s wish to participate in SDM is different depending on the setting and type of survey (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially in the context of serious or life‐threatening illness, shared decision making (SDM) has been shown to be useful, when different therapy options exist with different benefits and risks (10). Furthermore, SDM is considered to be useful if outcomes are uncertain (10). The patient’s wish to participate in SDM is different depending on the setting and type of survey (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unterschiede zwischen ambulant und station ä r t ä tigen Ä rzten werden kaum berichtet. Floer et al [8] verweisen darauf, dass vor allem j ü ngere Ä rzte an einer gemeinsamen Entscheidung interessiert seien.…”
Section: Aktuelle Forschungsbefunde -Ein ü Berblickunclassified
“…weniger partizipativ mit ihnen umgehen [18] . Auch kann der Wille zu einer gemeinsamen Entscheidungsbeteiligung bei Patienten aus unteren sozialen Schichten weniger stark ausgepr ä gt sein [28] . Diese Patienten k ö nnen eine Entscheidungsbeteiligung mit h ö herer Wahrscheinlichkeit nicht gut als Ressource einer " hohen " Versorgungsqualit ä t nutzen, da sie sich weniger aktiv am Behandlungsprozess und letztlich auch an der gesundheitlichen Versorgung beteiligen.…”
unclassified