2020
DOI: 10.1111/mec.15499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shared ancestral polymorphisms and chromosomal rearrangements as potential drivers of local adaptation in a marine fish

Abstract: Gene flow has tremendous importance for local adaptation, by influencing the fate of de novo mutations, maintaining standing genetic variation and driving adaptive introgression. Furthermore, structural variation as chromosomal rearrangements may facilitate adaptation despite high gene flow. However, our understanding of the evolutionary mechanisms impending or favouring local adaptation in the presence of gene flow is still limited to a restricted number of study systems. In this study, we examined how demogr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
53
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
8
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference in structure is consistent with previous studies in humans showing that CNVs contribute to higher genetic divergence than SNPs (Levy et al., 2007; Pang et al., 2010; Sudmant et al., 2015). Furthermore, recent studies in marine fishes also showed that genomic regions including structural variants account for higher genetic divergence than SNPs that are distributed across the whole genome (Barth et al., 2019; Berg et al., 2016; Cayuela et al., 2020; Kess et al, 2020). Several hypotheses may explain this pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This difference in structure is consistent with previous studies in humans showing that CNVs contribute to higher genetic divergence than SNPs (Levy et al., 2007; Pang et al., 2010; Sudmant et al., 2015). Furthermore, recent studies in marine fishes also showed that genomic regions including structural variants account for higher genetic divergence than SNPs that are distributed across the whole genome (Barth et al., 2019; Berg et al., 2016; Cayuela et al., 2020; Kess et al, 2020). Several hypotheses may explain this pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can have functional consequences, notably impacting the regulation of gene expression (Gamazon & Stranger, 2015) and recombination rate by diminishing the frequency of meiotic crossing‐over, which can preserve the integrity of an adaptive haplotype (Rowan et al., 2019). SVs are increasingly recognized for their important role in a wide spectrum of evolutionary processes such as in environmental adaptation (Van’t Hof et al., 2016; Wellenreuther, Rosenquist, Jakson, & Larson, 2017), reproductive isolation (Berdan, Blanckaert, Butlin, & Bank, 2019; Laporte et al., 2019), life cycles and development (Mérot et al, 2018; Cayuela et al., 2020) and speciation (Rieseberg, 2001; Serrato‐Capuchina & Matute, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Pleistocene glaciations shaped contemporary genetic structure of the abalone Haliotis asinina in the Indo‐Pacific (Benardine Jeffrey et al, 2007), the American lobster, Homarus americanus , along the northeastern coast of North America (Kenchington et al, 2009), and the octopod Pareledone turqueti in the Southern Ocean (Strugnell et al, 2012). Pleistocene glaciations were also responsible for the divergence of species complexes, such as the Damselfishes Pomacentrus coelestis (Sorenson et al, 2014) and the capelin Mallotus villosus (Cayuela et al, 2020; Dodson et al, 2007). Sequential glacial and interglacial periods have then further shaped the divergence history of species as a result of periods of isolation intercalated by gene flow (Weigelt et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barcodes were removed using cutadapt (Martin, 2011) and trimmed to 80 bp, allowing for an error rate of 0.2. They were then demultiplexed using the "process_radtags" module of stacks version 1.48 (Catchen et al, 2013) and aligned to the capelin draft genome (Cayuela et al, 2020) assembly using bwa-mem (Li, 2013) with default parameters. Next, aligned reads were processed with stacks version 1.48 for SNP calling and genotyping.…”
Section: Dna Sequencing Genotyping and Discovery Of Putative Cnvsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the capelin reference genome (Cayuela et al, 2020), we examined if the putative CNVs discovered were located within sequences of protein genes or within intergenic regions. Note that the genome is assembled at the scaffold level; nevertheless, contig order F I G U R E 1 Map of the study area showing the sites sampled in the three capelin lineages.…”
Section: Dna Sequencing Genotyping and Discovery Of Putative Cnvsmentioning
confidence: 99%