2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2022.104332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Share the code, not just the data: A case study of the reproducibility of articles published in the Journal of Memory and Language under the open data policy

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 172 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lack of data access is another key challenge to reproducibility. Adoption of open-science practices, including sharing of data and code, represents a partial solution to this issue [ 57 , 58 ], acknowledging that not all data can be shared openly owing to privacy concerns. Similarly, transparent descriptions of data collection and analytic methods are necessary for reproduction [ 59 ].…”
Section: Approaches To Improving Reproducibility and Scientific Integ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lack of data access is another key challenge to reproducibility. Adoption of open-science practices, including sharing of data and code, represents a partial solution to this issue [ 57 , 58 ], acknowledging that not all data can be shared openly owing to privacy concerns. Similarly, transparent descriptions of data collection and analytic methods are necessary for reproduction [ 59 ].…”
Section: Approaches To Improving Reproducibility and Scientific Integ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Journal of Memory and Language adopted a mandatory data-sharing policy in 2019. An evaluation of this policy implementation found that data sharing increased more than 50% and the strongest predictor for reproducibility was the sharing of analysis code, increasing the probability of reproducibility by 40% [ 57 ]. Such practices are also fostered by the creation and use of infrastructure, such as the aforementioned SoBigData, and reproducibility network groups, such as the Swiss Reproducibility Network, a peer-lead group that aims to improve both replicability and reproducibility [ 74 ], improve communication, collaboration, and encourage the use of rigorous research practices.…”
Section: Approaches To Improving Reproducibility and Scientific Integ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…raw data and processing data) as well as the code-syntax that was used to carry out the analyses in the given software 10 . Publishing the code-syntax is useful for promoting reproducibility, as it allows the same analytical steps to be followed, but also promotes quality control through increased opportunities to find bugs in the code (Laurinavichyute et al, 2022). All of this is especially 10 One of the reviewers suggested indicating, and we agreed with him, the need to provide open access also to the total output file produced by software programmes such as M-plus or the Lavaan package in R. As the reviewer says, "the total output file is very informative for other researchers in order to replicate the reported results".…”
Section: Be Open Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few examples illustrate the reality. Laurinavichyute et al (2022) were able to reproduce the results of only 34% to 56% of the 59 papers that they chose to inspect from the Journal of Memory and Language, after the journal implemented an open data and code policy. Hardwicke and colleagues (2021) reported that they were only able to reproduce the results of 15 of 25 papers in Psychological Science that received open data badges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%