2022
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v36i9.21190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shaping Noise for Robust Attributions in Neural Stochastic Differential Equations

Abstract: Neural SDEs with Brownian motion as noise lead to smoother attributions than traditional ResNets. Various attribution methods such as saliency maps, integrated gradients, DeepSHAP and DeepLIFT have been shown to be more robust for neural SDEs than for ResNets using the recently proposed sensitivity metric. In this paper, we show that neural SDEs with adaptive attribution-driven noise lead to even more robust attributions and smaller sensitivity metrics than traditional neural SDEs with Brownian motion as noise… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adding subtle noise not perceptible to the human eye, for example, could reliably cause deep learning models to misclassify a photo of a cat as guacamole, or a lionfish as eggnog . In biology, protein structure prediction models have been shown to exhibit the same vulnerability to adversarial attacks . Finally, deep learning often entails enormous computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adding subtle noise not perceptible to the human eye, for example, could reliably cause deep learning models to misclassify a photo of a cat as guacamole, or a lionfish as eggnog . In biology, protein structure prediction models have been shown to exhibit the same vulnerability to adversarial attacks . Finally, deep learning often entails enormous computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adversarial embeddings are at least as far from the reference as the most stabilizing and destabilizing embeddings in ProTherm (Figure 2b), while BLOSUM distances are comparable (Figure 3b). Moreover, Jha et al [7] observed that larger BLOSUM distances between original and perturbed sequences lead to higher RMSD in predicted structures, therefore we expect adversarial perturbations to produce a significant structural change. We stress that adversarial mutant positions for ProTherm are those that maximize the attention scores and, in most cases, differ from ProTherm mutation sites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It is natural to interpret this reasoning through the lens of adversarial attacks [6], where the goal is to craft small perturbations of the inputs while inducing the most significant change in predictions. A similar approach is presented in [7], where the authors already propose a notion of “adversarial mutation” on amino acid sequences and use the perturbations to assess the reliability of structure prediction on the RoseTTAFold [1] model. Specifically, they define a robustness measure for structure prediction based on the computation of the inverse RMSD between original and perturbed structures and use it to produce adversarial sequences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations