2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.4991873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shaping effects on toroidal magnetohydrodynamic modes in the presence of plasma and wall resistivity

Abstract: This study explores the effects of plasma shaping on magnetohydrodynamic mode stability and rotational stabilization in a tokamak, including both plasma and wall resistivity. Depending upon the plasma shape, safety factor, and distance from the wall, the β-limit for rotational stabilization is given by either the resistive-plasma ideal-wall (tearing mode) limit or the ideal-plasma resistive-wall (resistive wall mode) limit. In order to explore this broad parameter space, a sharp-boundary model is developed wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well understood that IPRWMs eliminate the stabilizing influence of the wall on times comparable to the diffusion time, which we have chosen as τ w ω A = 2 × 10 3 and τ w ω A = 2 × 10 4 . The IPRWMs corresponding to static plasmas in figure 4(b) are in qualitative agreement with figure 5 of Betti (1998), which employs τ w ω A = 2 × 10 4 , and with figures 2 and 3 of Rhodes et al (2018), where τ w ω A = 10 3 . It has been pointed out that at zero β the model under consideration is unstable if the wall is at infinity (7.2), accordingly, figure 4(b) shows residual IPRWMs at zero β.…”
Section: The Stability Of N = 1 Modes Surrounded By Ideal and Resistisupporting
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is well understood that IPRWMs eliminate the stabilizing influence of the wall on times comparable to the diffusion time, which we have chosen as τ w ω A = 2 × 10 3 and τ w ω A = 2 × 10 4 . The IPRWMs corresponding to static plasmas in figure 4(b) are in qualitative agreement with figure 5 of Betti (1998), which employs τ w ω A = 2 × 10 4 , and with figures 2 and 3 of Rhodes et al (2018), where τ w ω A = 10 3 . It has been pointed out that at zero β the model under consideration is unstable if the wall is at infinity (7.2), accordingly, figure 4(b) shows residual IPRWMs at zero β.…”
Section: The Stability Of N = 1 Modes Surrounded By Ideal and Resistisupporting
confidence: 80%
“…It is observed that D controls the amount of surface current at the plasma-vacuum transition. In many sharp-boundary models (Freidberg & Haas 1973, 1974Freidberg & Grossmann 1975;Betti 1998;Fitzpatrick 2008;Rhodes et al 2018) surface currents originate from the finite jump in the kinetic pressure at the plasma-vacuum interface. In the present model, which possesses a pressure profile that vanishes at the plasma edge, surface currents are not needed, but can be accommodated; however, for simplicity, we consider the D = 0 case only.…”
Section: Equilibrium Model: Vacuummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations