Shaping CACSD for Practical Use in the Process Industry

Schumann, R.; Körner, Steffen; Baker, Keith; Strickrodt, M.

doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)58575-4

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some of these principals were discussed in Alexandrov et al (2005), Shumann et al (1996) and Syska (2002).…”

Section: Directives Of Finite-frequency Identificationmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…On the other hand, it means that the system allows to solve the design problems when the design purpose is described by the technical indices (steady‐state errors, the bounds of input and output of the plant, the settling time and, etc. ).The problem must be solved automatically without user participation.The system must have the tools for its modernization by a researcher.Some of these principals were discussed in Alexandrov et al (2005), Shumann et al (1996) and Syska (2002).…”

Section: System Gamma Featuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

System GAMMA: the directives of finite‐frequency identification

Mikhailova

Alexandrov

2009

Kybernetes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present the results in the area of modern computer‐aided control system design tools relating to system identification.Design/methodology/approachThe finite‐frequency identification method was designed for the needs of active identification. The test signal represents the sum of harmonics with automatically tuned (self‐tuned) amplitudes and frequencies where the number of harmonics does not exceed the state space dimension of the plant. The self‐tuning of amplitudes is carried out to satisfy those requirements on the bounds of the input and output which hold true in the absence of a test signal.FindingsIn this paper, the software implementation of finite‐frequency identification method in the system GAMMA is considered. GAMMA is the two‐level computer‐aided design (CAD) tool for identification and controllers algorithms synthesis for linear plants.Practical implicationsThe system GAMMA is the complete and really working system.Originality/valueA new structure of the CAD tool for engineers‐developers of control systems is proposed and its program implementation is described. The new variant of finite‐frequency identification method with self‐tuning of identification parameters (test signal and identification time) is considered.

show abstract

“…Some of these principals were discussed in Alexandrov et al (2005), Shumann et al (1996) and Syska (2002).…”

Section: Directives Of Finite-frequency Identificationmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: System Gamma Featuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

System GAMMA: the directives of finite‐frequency identification

Mikhailova

Alexandrov

2009

Kybernetes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The ICACSD (industrial CACSD) concept as introduced at the 1996 IFAC Congress in San Francisco by Schumann, et al (1996) was defined to allow the application of advanced CACSD methods by industrial area engineers with a standard, but limited control education who are not necessarily experts in simulation or control. The design of complex nonlinear MIMO control systems based on PID controllers should be made possible for such non-expert users by careful preselection of appropriate CACSD methods and by hiding typical handling problems (like excessive parameterisation) behind a smart user interface.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%