2011
DOI: 10.1123/mcj.15.1.141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shaping by Stiffening: A Modeling Study for Lips

Abstract: On the basis of simulations carried out with a finite element biomechanical model of the face, the influence of the muscle stress stiffening effect was studied for the protrusion/rounding of the lips produced with the Orbicularis Oris (OO). It is shown that the stress stiffening effect influences lip shape. When stress stiffening is modeled, the variation in the crucial geometrical characteristics of the lips shows a clear saturation effect as the OO activation level increases. Similarly, for a sufficient amou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, OPI function indeed seems analogous to the lips, where discrete, task-specific mechanisms have been described as being used to produce different-sized constrictions; mechanisms of this kind, associated with distinct muscle combinations, have been described as producing biomechanically nonlinear or quantal-like effects (Fujimura 1989; Nazari et al 2011; Gick et al 2011) similar to those observed here for the OPI. Such effects have been used to explain why different lip shapes are associated with different areas (degrees) of constrictions in speech (e.g., flat-shaped lips for complete closures, but rounded, protruded lips for vowels; Gick et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In this sense, OPI function indeed seems analogous to the lips, where discrete, task-specific mechanisms have been described as being used to produce different-sized constrictions; mechanisms of this kind, associated with distinct muscle combinations, have been described as producing biomechanically nonlinear or quantal-like effects (Fujimura 1989; Nazari et al 2011; Gick et al 2011) similar to those observed here for the OPI. Such effects have been used to explain why different lip shapes are associated with different areas (degrees) of constrictions in speech (e.g., flat-shaped lips for complete closures, but rounded, protruded lips for vowels; Gick et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Lip elevation for force control may have limited the lips to use all the necessary muscular components needed to minimize variation of force. Changes in stiffness may influence the shape of the lips, such as pursing the lips (Nazari, Perrier, Chabanas, & Payan, 2011). Our findings indicating no increase in CV in the finger as force level increased and a decrease in CV as force increased in the lip may reflect different controls of stiffness between the effectors.…”
Section: Differences Between Oral and Manual Effectorsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This muscle plays a central role in the production of the lip protrusion and rounding gestures (Nazari et al, 2011). These gestures are essential for rounded vowels such as /u/, /o/ or /y/, and for closing labial gestures, which represent the key articulatory feature of bilabial stops such as /b/ and /p/.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%