2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.104974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape-stabilized phase change materials: Performance of simple physical blending synthesis and the potential of coconut based materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22,23 Thus, making full use of this part of energy is of great signicance to improve the utilization efficiency of solar energy and alleviate the energy crisis. However, the implementation of STEGs in the marine environment is hampered by several limiting factors originating from photothermal phase change energy storage units, [24][25][26] including low photothermal conversion capability, 27 insufficient shape stability during phase transition, 28,29 and poor underwater stability. 30 In addition, most of the composite PCMs previously reported in the literature lack exibility, [31][32][33][34][35] giving rise to low adaptability to large-scale assembly of STEGs 36 and application in various scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 Thus, making full use of this part of energy is of great signicance to improve the utilization efficiency of solar energy and alleviate the energy crisis. However, the implementation of STEGs in the marine environment is hampered by several limiting factors originating from photothermal phase change energy storage units, [24][25][26] including low photothermal conversion capability, 27 insufficient shape stability during phase transition, 28,29 and poor underwater stability. 30 In addition, most of the composite PCMs previously reported in the literature lack exibility, [31][32][33][34][35] giving rise to low adaptability to large-scale assembly of STEGs 36 and application in various scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to surface tension and capillary forces, micropores and mesopores are the most suitable kinds of nanoscale structures . The carbon material produced under the conditions determined by the OC1 model had mostly micropores (774.9 m 2 /g) and mesopores (640.4 m 2 /g) that are suitable as supporting material for PCM applications …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45 The carbon material produced under the conditions determined by the OC1 model had mostly micropores (774.9 m 2 /g) and mesopores (640.4 m 2 /g) that are suitable as supporting material for PCM applications. 60 Intensity of the peaks found in the FTIR spectra of the materials produced under the process conditions determined by both OC1 and OC2 models were weaker than those of the unprocessed biomass, Figure S3a,b. The latter result can be explained by the effect of carbonization and activation on the functional groups in the material.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Carbon Produced Atmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] However, poor shape stability and leakages associated with low thermal conductivity still considerably hinder their practical applications. [5,6] Currently, the strategy for shape stabilization of LSPCMs can be divided into the following: a) the physical blending of liquid state phase change materials (PCMs) with a porous material to form a shape-stabilized composite owing to the capillary force of porous materials; [7] b) encapsulation of PCMs in capsules with various sizes to prevent liquid beneficial for adsorbing various PCMs with high stability. [20] Liu et al succeeded in growing a knitting aryl network on the skeleton of copper to adjust the surface characteristics of copper foam and accomplished a 62.1% encapsulation for paraffin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 3–5 ] However, poor shape stability and leakages associated with low thermal conductivity still considerably hinder their practical applications. [ 5,6 ] Currently, the strategy for shape stabilization of LSPCMs can be divided into the following: a) the physical blending of liquid state phase change materials (PCMs) with a porous material to form a shape‐stabilized composite owing to the capillary force of porous materials; [ 7 ] b) encapsulation of PCMs in capsules with various sizes to prevent liquid leakage during the phase transition process; [ 8 ] c) fabrication shape stabilization via a chemical grafting strategy on some functional group active materials; [ 9,10 ] and d) electrospinning strategy. [ 11 ] Among the numerous reports on the shape stabilization of PCMs, the physical blending method stands out because of its practical operation technique and almost no waste emissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%