2020
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2008149117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape, size, and quantity of ingested external abrasives influence dental microwear texture formation in guinea pigs

Abstract: Food processing wears down teeth, thus affecting tooth functionality and evolutionary success. Other than intrinsic silica phytoliths, extrinsic mineral dust/grit adhering to plants causes tooth wear in mammalian herbivores. Dental microwear texture analysis (DMTA) is widely applied to infer diet from microscopic dental wear traces. The relationship between external abrasives and dental microwear texture (DMT) formation remains elusive. Feeding experiments with sheep have shown negligible effects of dust-laden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(88 reference statements)
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…without a time component) might well suggest an individual variation in tooth quality in the present study population. In previous DMTA studies [6063], higher Smc , Sq or Sdq values were associated with more abrasive diets. Yet, in the present study, the teeth more susceptible to lower mesowear scores (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…without a time component) might well suggest an individual variation in tooth quality in the present study population. In previous DMTA studies [6063], higher Smc , Sq or Sdq values were associated with more abrasive diets. Yet, in the present study, the teeth more susceptible to lower mesowear scores (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For example, Sq computes the standard deviation for the surface height (amplitude); Smc as inverse areal material ratio gives the height (amplitude) of the mean plane at a given areal material ratio p; and Vm gives the material volume at a specific height based on the material ratio p (=Smc). Measures of density like medf (mean density of furrows) or Spd (mean density of peaks) have been found to have high discriminatory power to resolve feeding preferences, both in mammals [61][62][63] and lizards [64], but rarely correlate with other well-separating parameters. This is a strong indication for the capacity of isotropy/anisotropy and density parameters to reflect unique features of the enamel surface topography that are not captured by many other DMTA parameters.…”
Section: Correlations Within Wear Proxy Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These pellets were produced from a ground, pelleted diet (formula 2820 Granovit AG, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland) into which 4 wt% of loess or kaolin, respectively, were mixed. The mixture was then re-pelleted and fed to the animals to assess the influence of external, clay-to-silt-sized mineral dust particles on dental wear (see Winkler et al, 2020 for further details and the influence of the external abrasives on dental microwear texture). For Experiment-3: Dust Addition, only incisor enamel was sampled using LA-MC-ICP-MS.…”
Section: Controlled Feeding Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle size is the typical measure of grit. Sedimentologists partition grit into clay‐sized (<2 μm), silt‐sized (2–63 μm), and sand‐sized (63–2000 μm) subcategories, 9,10 whereas arenologists describe sand on a scale from ‘very fine sands and silts’ (3.9–125 μm) to fine‐, course‐, and medium‐sized grains (125–1000 μm) 1 . The airborne mobilization of grit by eolian (wind) activity argues for another subcategory, dust, which some authors define as particles <100 μm 3 .…”
Section: What Is Grit?mentioning
confidence: 99%