2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-07254-3_46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape Sensing of Stiffened Plates Using Inverse FEM Aided by Virtual Strain Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The success of these investigations has also prompted the use of iFEM for SHM applications, specifically for damage detection in metallic [38,39] and composite [40][41][42] structures, and more recently for damage prognosis [43,44]. A key limitation of the 2D iFEM is the need for a large number of strain measurements to generate accurate results, which can be resolved using an optimal selection of sensor locations [45][46][47] and strain pre-extrapolation to produce virtual measurement sites [48][49][50][51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of these investigations has also prompted the use of iFEM for SHM applications, specifically for damage detection in metallic [38,39] and composite [40][41][42] structures, and more recently for damage prognosis [43,44]. A key limitation of the 2D iFEM is the need for a large number of strain measurements to generate accurate results, which can be resolved using an optimal selection of sensor locations [45][46][47] and strain pre-extrapolation to produce virtual measurement sites [48][49][50][51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strain pre-extrapolation techniques interpolate or extrapolate the measurements on the top and bottom of the shell in the elements missing experimental measurements before the iFEM computes the displacement field; this solution has been proven to increase the accuracy of the iFEM methods and to reduce the number of sensors required to achieve a prescribed performance [ 33 , 34 , 36 ]. Any interpolation/extrapolation method may be employed in principle; the state-of-the-art employs the SEA, modal expansion [ 37 ], and physics-based pre-extrapolation techniques [ 38 ], although polynomial fittings may be robust enough for simpler case studies. It should be noted that the pre-extrapolated values do not have to be exactly equal to the true values that would be measured by sensors since weights may alleviate this discrepancy [ 33 , 34 ], and the displacement field reconstructed by the iFEM restores the compatibility in the displacement field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the pre-extrapolated values do not have to be exactly equal to the true values that would be measured by sensors since weights may alleviate this discrepancy [ 33 , 34 ], and the displacement field reconstructed by the iFEM restores the compatibility in the displacement field. The interested reader may refer to [ 33 ] for a comparison of the SEA and polynomial fittings as strain pre-extrapolation techniques, while the SEA and modal expansion methods are explored in [ 37 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%