2013
DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/29/11/115011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape optimization methods for the inverse obstacle problem with generalized impedance boundary conditions

Abstract: We aim to reconstruct an inclusion ω immersed in a perfect fluid flowing in a larger bounded domain via boundary measurements on ∂ . The obstacle ω is assumed to have a thin layer and is then modeled using generalized boundary conditions (precisely Ventcel boundary conditions). We first obtain an identifiability result (i.e. the uniqueness of the solution of the inverse problem) for annular configurations through explicit computations. Then, this inverse problem of reconstructing ω is studied, thanks to the to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that when β = 0 we retrieve the Steklov eigenvalues, and we recover the Laplace-Beltrami eigenvalues by considering 1 β λ 1,β and letting β go to +∞, see Section 2.1. Note also that the close but distinct eigenvalue problem − u = λu in Ω u + α∂ n u + γ u = 0 on ∂Ω (7) was considered by J.B. Kennedy in [21]. He transforms this problem into a Robin type problem to prove a Faber-Krahn type inequality when the constants α, γ are nonnegative: the ball is the best possible domain among those of given volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that when β = 0 we retrieve the Steklov eigenvalues, and we recover the Laplace-Beltrami eigenvalues by considering 1 β λ 1,β and letting β go to +∞, see Section 2.1. Note also that the close but distinct eigenvalue problem − u = λu in Ω u + α∂ n u + γ u = 0 on ∂Ω (7) was considered by J.B. Kennedy in [21]. He transforms this problem into a Robin type problem to prove a Faber-Krahn type inequality when the constants α, γ are nonnegative: the ball is the best possible domain among those of given volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5,20,22,33]), and obstacle characterized by different limit conditions, such as Neumann or generalized boundary conditions (see e.g. [8,21]). However, since such methods rely on the minimization of a (shape) cost-type functional which in turn needs the resolution of several well-posed direct problems, they need in particular some boundary data on the whole boundary of the domain of study, and therefore cannot be directly used for Problem (1.1).…”
Section: Page 87])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, we can mention the works of Cakoni et al [15,14] and Caubet et al [17] for the Laplace's equation, of Bourgeois et al [12] and Kateb et al [37] for the Helmholtz equation and of Chaulet et al [19] for the Maxwell's equations.…”
Section: Introduction and General Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%