2018
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.284.408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape Indexes for Dieless Forming of the Elongated Forgings with Sharpened End by Tensile Drawing with Rupture

Abstract: The criteria for the assessment of the form change in the process of direct profiling of workpieces , applying the stretching method with a rupture are developed, methods for their calculation are proposed with allowance for the volume of the redistributed metal and energy costs for deformation. The nature of the functional connection of these criteria of shape change assessment with the work of deformation is determined.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now, taking f M = 16 vol.%, the M s temperature was calculated as 42 °C. The tensile stress was calculated according to Equations (2)–(6) using the following parameters: T sol = 1320 °C [ 49 ], E = 200 GPa [ 62 ], ν = 0.22 [ 63 ], α A = 18.6 × 10 −6 K −1 , and α M = 13.9 × 10 −6 K −1 [ 64 ]. The volumetric effect of austenite→martensite transformation was derived from the equation: Δ V A → M = 2.5–1.08·(C γ %) [ 65 ] assuming a carbon content in austenite (C γ %) of 1.50 wt.%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, taking f M = 16 vol.%, the M s temperature was calculated as 42 °C. The tensile stress was calculated according to Equations (2)–(6) using the following parameters: T sol = 1320 °C [ 49 ], E = 200 GPa [ 62 ], ν = 0.22 [ 63 ], α A = 18.6 × 10 −6 K −1 , and α M = 13.9 × 10 −6 K −1 [ 64 ]. The volumetric effect of austenite→martensite transformation was derived from the equation: Δ V A → M = 2.5–1.08·(C γ %) [ 65 ] assuming a carbon content in austenite (C γ %) of 1.50 wt.%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative technologies for producing the boride coatings, which have none of the inherent disadvantages of the CTT (process time, low productivity, the need to heat the entire workpiece, deformation and warping, the need for expensive equipment, etc. ), are the boriding methods using concentrated energy fluxes (CEFs) [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. In [ 21 ], a method is proposed for electroerosive boriding including applying a boron-containing surface coating by an electrode made in the form of a rod blown with a cooler.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the manufacture of structural sections with required service properties different fabrication methods are used [1,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12]: skew roll piercing process, pilger process, Fretz-Moon pipe process, induction welding process, spirally bent strip welding. Hot-finished process (HFP) [13][14][15][16] and cold-formed process (CFP) [7,[10][11][12] is the most common manufacturing for RHS. These consist in the roll-forming of circular tube from a strip, welding of edges and re-forming into rectangular tube section (round to square or rectangular section forming) with heating (HFP) or without heating (CFP), respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%