2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape and topology optimization based on the phase field method and sensitivity analysis

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThis paper discusses a structural optimization method that optimizes shape and topology based on the phase field method. The proposed method has the same functional capabilities as a structural optimization method based on the level set method incorporating perimeter control functions. The advantage of the method is the simplicity of computation, since extra operations such as re-initialization of functions are not required. Structural shapes are represented by the phase field function defined i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
138
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 312 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
138
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the several methods that appeared in the literature, such as SIMP (Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization) method [14,49,16], the homogenization method [3,13,15], the phase field method [18,41,51,17] or the Soft Kill Option [31,23], the level-set method for shape and topology optimization [10,11,35,38,44] seems to fulfill industrial requirements in a satisfying way. Using a level-set function to describe implicitly the boundary of a shape [36,37] allows topological changes to appear in an easy way, while the geometric nature of the method is a benefit for the study of problems where the position of the interface plays a significant role (stress constraints, thermal problems with flux across the boundary, etc.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the several methods that appeared in the literature, such as SIMP (Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization) method [14,49,16], the homogenization method [3,13,15], the phase field method [18,41,51,17] or the Soft Kill Option [31,23], the level-set method for shape and topology optimization [10,11,35,38,44] seems to fulfill industrial requirements in a satisfying way. Using a level-set function to describe implicitly the boundary of a shape [36,37] allows topological changes to appear in an easy way, while the geometric nature of the method is a benefit for the study of problems where the position of the interface plays a significant role (stress constraints, thermal problems with flux across the boundary, etc.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been utilized for solid-liquid transitions, diffusion, solidification, crack propagation, multiphase flow and eventually in topology optimization [31]. In the application of these theories, a phase-field function is specified over the design domain that is composed of two phases (e.g.…”
Section: Phase-field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In topology optimization utilizing the phase-field method [31][32][33], this interface region defines the structural boundary, thus separating material from void, and is modified via a dynamic evolution of the phase-field function. The primary difference between the level-set and phasefield methods is mainly due to the fact that in the phase-field method, the interface between the boundaries of the two distinct phases is not tracked throughout optimization.…”
Section: Phase-field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, there are few approaches in the literature Wang and Zhou (2004), Burger and Stainko (2006), and Takezawa et al (2010). …”
Section: Topology Design With Multi-materials Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%