2013
DOI: 10.1080/21568316.2013.789655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Shangri-La” and the New “Great Game”: Exploring Tourism Geopolitics Between China and India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some controversial destinations are considered such because of established trade ethics, or rather the aversion to doing business with nations whose officials are known for human rights violations; others are partitioned states with differing political views (Webster and Timothy 2006). Hannam (2013, p. 178) explored the “geopolitical uncertainties” in China and India and found accounts of tourism from one country to the other to be “ambivalent at best” because the historical, cultural, economic, and religious perceptions of the other shape travelers’ experiences. Additionally, when national regimes alter their political stance, the economic landscape at the local level can allow more entrepreneurial endeavors from its citizens, which can result in unique authentic tourism experiences or, to the contrary, increased commercialization (Hingtgen et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some controversial destinations are considered such because of established trade ethics, or rather the aversion to doing business with nations whose officials are known for human rights violations; others are partitioned states with differing political views (Webster and Timothy 2006). Hannam (2013, p. 178) explored the “geopolitical uncertainties” in China and India and found accounts of tourism from one country to the other to be “ambivalent at best” because the historical, cultural, economic, and religious perceptions of the other shape travelers’ experiences. Additionally, when national regimes alter their political stance, the economic landscape at the local level can allow more entrepreneurial endeavors from its citizens, which can result in unique authentic tourism experiences or, to the contrary, increased commercialization (Hingtgen et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hall (2017) argues that geopolitics is not only concerned with the “occupation of space and territory,” but it is also concerned with the “political consequences of different ways of knowing and representing the world order” (p. 15). Accordingly, geopolitics is understood as the way a nation or its citizens view the world and “how the global landscape is structured into different nation-states,” which ultimately influences the structuring of foreign policy and the formation of bilateral relations between nations (Hannam 2013, p. 179). The study of geopolitics and tourism is dualistic, with some scholars examining how tourism “constitutes and reflects” geopolitical discourse.…”
Section: Politics and Tourism: A Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To a notable extent, it can provide embodied evidence to intensify or challenge the preexisting geographical imaginations of certain places or people (Crouch et al 2001). This conceptual approach is also very concerned about tourists as an independent agency that participates in or challenges existing geopolitical contexts via their own tourism and cultural experiences, including inside and outside the official government policymaking (Agnew 2003;Hannam 2013;An et al 2020).…”
Section: Travelling Abroad Experience and Geopolitical Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%