1995
DOI: 10.1086/448761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shame in the Cybernetic Fold: Reading Silvan Tomkins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 336 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
90
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…12 If discipline moves the body through affect it becomes easy to understand how emotions of security and insecurity can emerge non-consciously in social interactions, even in subjects who would not designate themselves as anxious. Affect theory provides a way to enhance our understanding of disciplinary power, but also a way to move beyond Foucault because it allows us to lift off some parts of the very heavy conceptual apparatus that always risk becoming a life of its own in Foucaultinspired work (see again Kosofsky Sedgwick and Frank, 1995).…”
Section: Affectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 If discipline moves the body through affect it becomes easy to understand how emotions of security and insecurity can emerge non-consciously in social interactions, even in subjects who would not designate themselves as anxious. Affect theory provides a way to enhance our understanding of disciplinary power, but also a way to move beyond Foucault because it allows us to lift off some parts of the very heavy conceptual apparatus that always risk becoming a life of its own in Foucaultinspired work (see again Kosofsky Sedgwick and Frank, 1995).…”
Section: Affectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking a less psychically grounded and subject-focused view of affect (Blackman, 2008a), these perspectives see it as something of a visceral force, or a vector, that operates between bodies (Sedgwick and Frank, 1995). Affects are autonomous from the subject, somewhat automatic and necessarily reflexive (Blackman, 2008a: 16;Massumi, 1996;.…”
Section: Critical Theorizations Of Affect: Themes and Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social scientists have drawn upon various traditions to work up this sharp distinction, notably a) psychoanalysis (e.g. Day Sclater et al, 2009), b) the work of a number of psychologists and neuroscientists, especially Tomkins (Sedgwick and Frank, 1995) and Damasio (Cromby, 2007), and c) the philosophy of Deleuze and Guattari 13 (Massumi, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deleuzian philosopher Brian Massumi (2002, p. 4), for instance, straightforwardly admits that his project began as an attempt to "part company with the linguistic model at the basis of the most widespread concepts of coding". Sedgwick and Frank (1995) begin their now classic homage to Silvan Tomkins' theory of affect with a hostile attack on the limitations of critical discursive approaches, and Craib's (1997) clarion call for the rebirth of an affect-oriented psychoanalytical sociology was entitled "Social Constructionism as a social psychosis", no less. Patricia Clough's quixotic efforts to synthesize some of these influences are consistently structured by a gesture of contrasting 'good' bodily affect with 'bad' consciously mindful discourse, as when she boasts of "toppling… semiotic chains of signification and identity and linguistic-based structures of meaning making' from their 'privileged position" (2010, p. 223).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%