Coastal Engineering 1968 1969
DOI: 10.1061/9780872620131.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shallow Water Waves A Comparison of Theories and Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a reasonable agreement between the data and mathematical functions, although neither the linear wave theory nor the Boussinesq equations capture the asymmetrical wave shape nor the fine details of the free-surface profile shape. The findings are consistent with an earlier study of relatively large amplitude shallow water waves [35]. Further the experimental observations highlight the asymmetry of the free-surface undulations, with some differences in wave shape from crest to trough and from trough to crest.…”
Section: Undular Tidal Boressupporting
confidence: 91%
“…There is a reasonable agreement between the data and mathematical functions, although neither the linear wave theory nor the Boussinesq equations capture the asymmetrical wave shape nor the fine details of the free-surface profile shape. The findings are consistent with an earlier study of relatively large amplitude shallow water waves [35]. Further the experimental observations highlight the asymmetry of the free-surface undulations, with some differences in wave shape from crest to trough and from trough to crest.…”
Section: Undular Tidal Boressupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The adoption of an adequate truncation order N is in fact a potential criticism of all formulations of Fourier wave theory, including that recommended by Huang 16 and 32, the results being indistinguishable from the Cokelet tablesZ at N = 32 in shallow water and at N = 8 in deep water. That N rather than M is the crucial parameter has been confirmed in a rather more detailed analysis by Sobey,17 which has shown that the Fenton choice of M = N is appropriate provided that N is adequate for the particular steady wave solution.…”
Section: Fenton Formulationmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The unknown variables in a Fourier wave solution are k, ti, C , or C,, Q, R, q, for m=O (l)M and (16) and the dynamic free surface boundary condition (DFSBC) at each of the free surface nodes Note in particular the use of the trapezoidal rule in equation (13) for the MWL. This is an exact result for the continuous integral in equation (7), where q ( x ) is represented by a truncated Fourier series, as is implied by equation (10).…”
Section: Fourier Approximation Wave Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is overcome by making an empirically based assumption that the still water level (Z=0) occurs roughly one-third ofthe vertical distance from trough to crest. This assumption, although not strictly valid across all wave types, is commonly observed in laboratory (Flick, Guza, and Inman, 1981) and higher-order, nonlinear wave theory (i.e.. Le Méhauté, Divoky, and Lin, 1968) where vertical asymmetry develops in a propagating waveform before breaking with a narrower, high crest and wider low trough. Results presented in Table 4 show the effect of altemative definitions of break point on the derived breaking wave height.…”
Section: Errors and Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 92%