2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-010-9430-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shallow Water Flows in Channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare the numerical results obtained by the present scheme (dotted line) to the numerical solution obtained using the upwind Roe-type scheme (solid line) in [14]. The comparison shows a good agreement between the two schemes.…”
Section: Perturbations Of Steady State Of Restmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We compare the numerical results obtained by the present scheme (dotted line) to the numerical solution obtained using the upwind Roe-type scheme (solid line) in [14]. The comparison shows a good agreement between the two schemes.…”
Section: Perturbations Of Steady State Of Restmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The shallow water equations for flows through channels with variable cross-section are given by, [14],…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many upwind (see, e.g., [1,2,5,9,10,18,22,31,33,37] ) and central (see, e.g., [6,8,15,23,28,40,41,45] ) schemes for the shallow water system (1) , which is a hyperbolic system of conservation (if B x ≡ B y ≡ 0) or balance (if B is not a constant) laws, have been proposed in the past two decades. Roughly speaking, the main difference between upwind and central schemes is that upwind schemes use characteristic information and utilize (approximate) Riemann problem solvers to determine nonlinear wave propagation, while central schemes are based on averaging over the waves without using their detailed structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%