Shallow‐marine calciclastic mass‐transport deposits in an evolving thrust‐top basin: A case study from the North Dalmatian foreland basin, Croatia

Abstract

Mass‐transport deposits are products of resedimentation phenomena involving a broad spectrum of gravity‐driven processes, and commonly have a high preservation potential in deep‐marine environments. This study documents various types of mass‐transport deposits that are interbedded with intensely bioturbated shallow‐marine calciclastic sediments deposited along a reflective coast during the middle and late Eocene. The sedimentary succession, located in the vicinity of Novigrad in northern Dalmatia, Croatia, comprises sediments deposited in a range of nearshore and carbonate ramp environments, and represents the infill of a thrust‐top (piggyback) basin of the North Dalmatian foreland basin. Five types of mass‐transport deposits, ranging in thickness from 13 cm to 6 m, have been identified: (i) calcilutite and calcarenite slumps; (ii) conglomeratic slump‐debrites with a ‘dough‐like’ appearance; (iii) blocky‐flow deposits bearing large blocks of beachface and/or shoreface deposits; (iv) rockfall deposits comprising scattered blocks of beachface conglomerates and shoreface calcarenites; and (v) ‘classical’ matrix‐supported debrites. Calciturbidites are rare and mainly comprise Ta and Tb divisions. Conglomeratic slump‐debrites are mostly found in association with offshore‐transition deposits, suggesting that mass flows were triggered above the storm wave base likely due to a combined effect of: (i) strong earthquakes related to the tectonic development of the basin; (ii) sediment destabilization due to pore‐water overpressure during forced regressions; and (iii) storm‐wave loading affecting the shallow seabed. Progressive deepening likely favoured mass‐flow transformations, although the overall paucity of turbidites suggests relatively short mass‐flow transport distance and turbidity current bypass to deeper realms. Multiple erosion phases and resedimentation processes from the Cretaceous to the late Eocene contributed to the diverse suite of extraformational clasts in the mass‐transport deposits studied. The mass‐transport deposits may be triggered and emplaced in shallow‐marine settings mainly during regressive stages of basin development, as the diverse gravel clast composition suggests significant tectonic influence. Although the mass‐transport deposits reported herein are relatively small, some of their peculiar sedimentary features and occurrence within shallow‐marine calciclastic deposits render them rather unique and suitable for a re‐assessment of the nature and evolutionary continuum of processes involved in subaqueous sediment mass transport, as well as the preservation potential of sedimentary features in high‐energy wave‐reworked environments.