1996
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1098(96)00193-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shallow donors in GaN: A magnetic double resonance investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6(d)] we deduce a coupling constant of 1.30 MHz which is within the error limits in good agreement with the value deduced from the angular variation of the quadrupole lines. These values agree also with those previously published for as-grown materials of different origin [38,[40][41][42][43]; see also Table IV.…”
Section: Endor Measurementssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…6(d)] we deduce a coupling constant of 1.30 MHz which is within the error limits in good agreement with the value deduced from the angular variation of the quadrupole lines. These values agree also with those previously published for as-grown materials of different origin [38,[40][41][42][43]; see also Table IV.…”
Section: Endor Measurementssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The absolute magnitude of the two PDOS is also eliminated as a concern, since it is the relative magnitudes at Ga and N sites that are being compared. We note that double-resonance EPR measurements of Overhauser shifts due to residual donors in h-GaN [37] provide information about the greater relative strength of the hyperfine interactions of an electron to 14 N relative to 69 Ga or 71 Ga nuclei (although the ratio given based on the Overhauser shifts can be questioned because of the neglect of the different magnetogyric ratios for the two nuclei). The hyperfine interactions reflect a spatial average over a donor hydrogenic 1s orbital, and thus cannot be directly compared to our results involving delocalized (metallic) conduction band electrons.…”
Section: Comparison Of Electronic Projected Densities Of States Atmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a serious problem to understand with our tentative model of a Ga interstitial why the field gradients at the interstitial position and at the regular unperturbed Ga lattice site should be so similar. On the other hand a very similar electric field gradient (V zz = 6.45 x 10 20 V/m 2 ) was reported from Overhauser shift double resonance experiments on the donor [10]. A hf interaction is necessary to produce the Overhauser shift of the EPR line.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%