Proceedings of the 3rd Unconventional Resources Technology Conference 2015
DOI: 10.15530/urtec-2015-2172464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shale Gas Production Decline Trend Comparison Over Time and Basins Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Baihly et al, 2010(Baihly et al, , 2015 also observed the same results in initial gas production rate from the Barnett shale when compared to other major US shale gas plays like Haynesville, Marcellus, Eagleford, Woodford and Fayetteville. Figure 3 shows the variability in performance among the different shale plays (Baihly et al, 2015). Stephens non-core counties (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Baihly et al, 2010(Baihly et al, , 2015 also observed the same results in initial gas production rate from the Barnett shale when compared to other major US shale gas plays like Haynesville, Marcellus, Eagleford, Woodford and Fayetteville. Figure 3 shows the variability in performance among the different shale plays (Baihly et al, 2015). Stephens non-core counties (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The initial gas production rate in the Barnett shale was also found to be lower compared to other major US shale gas plays like the Eagleford, Marcellus and Haynesville shale (Rezaee, 2015). (Baihly et al, 2010(Baihly et al, , 2015 also observed the same results in initial gas production rate from the Barnett shale when compared to other major US shale gas plays like Haynesville, Marcellus, Eagleford, Woodford and Fayetteville. Figure 3 shows the variability in performance among the different shale plays (Baihly et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…An approximation of 1.25 trillion cubic meters of gas can be technically recovered from the Barnett reservoir [19][20][21]. Compared to the other major shale gas plays in the USA, the Barnett shale has the lowest initial gas production rate and the lowest decline rate after 5 years of production [14,15]. The typical reservoir depth is 1980-2590 m, and the reservoir thickness is 30-180 m [22].…”
Section: Barnett Shalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of a well is related strongly to the production rate, particularly for a shale gas well whose production rate is featured by a high initial decline rate after peak production [14,15]. Therefore, early production data can be used as a key parameter for predicting the performance of a shale gas well at the end of life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite further improvements to geomechanical models, recovery from gas shales is still low, and the decline rate of unconventional reservoirs is still concerning (Baihly et al, 2015). One reason for this unfavorable situation is the uncertainty in modeling the propagation of the fracture tip and aperture, within shales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%