2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shaking table tests on a 5-storey unreinforced masonry structure strengthened by ultra-high ductile cementitious composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) to verify the proposed approach for IDR demand of masonry structures. The shake table tests [41] were adopted to obtain IDR of the 1/4-scaled model, and the calculated results are compared with those calculated by the proposed method, as shown in Table 4. The measured natural period of the 1/4-scaled model is 0.126s and the similarity coefficient is 3.162:1, so the natural period of the BSM is 0.397s.…”
Section: Comparison Between Shake Table Tests and The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1) to verify the proposed approach for IDR demand of masonry structures. The shake table tests [41] were adopted to obtain IDR of the 1/4-scaled model, and the calculated results are compared with those calculated by the proposed method, as shown in Table 4. The measured natural period of the 1/4-scaled model is 0.126s and the similarity coefficient is 3.162:1, so the natural period of the BSM is 0.397s.…”
Section: Comparison Between Shake Table Tests and The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured average compressive strength of masonry and mortar are 3.3MPa and 1.5MPa, respectively. The specific value of other material strengths can be referred to [41]. The failure of the element is determined by the maximum strain and stress rather than cumulative damage.…”
Section: Comparison Between Shake Table Tests and The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic characteristics of the structure can directly reflect the changes in characteristics before and after reinforcement [15]. Researchers evaluated the effects of reinforcement on structural dynamic characteristics based on vibration frequency and damping characteristics [16][17][18]. Constant micro-motion test was conducted using a wireless vibration test system before and after the implementation of the seismic reinforcement project.…”
Section: Vibration Testmentioning
confidence: 99%