2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shaking table tests of the seismic response of a utility tunnel with a joint connection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A typical and representative gas compartment [24][25][26][27] of a real utility tunnel in China's Beijing City is introduced in this study, as shown in Figure 1, represented by the following parameters: section width, w c � 2.00 m; section height, h c � 4.00 m; length of gas compartment (distance between two adjacent firewalls), L c � 200.00 m. e city gas is uniformly mixed together with the air at a specific ratio to create the gas mixture. e gas compartment is filled with the gas mixture at a certain length at one end of it.…”
Section: Brief Introduction Of Gas Compartmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical and representative gas compartment [24][25][26][27] of a real utility tunnel in China's Beijing City is introduced in this study, as shown in Figure 1, represented by the following parameters: section width, w c � 2.00 m; section height, h c � 4.00 m; length of gas compartment (distance between two adjacent firewalls), L c � 200.00 m. e city gas is uniformly mixed together with the air at a specific ratio to create the gas mixture. e gas compartment is filled with the gas mixture at a certain length at one end of it.…”
Section: Brief Introduction Of Gas Compartmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Including the seismic response of the single-compartment utility tunnel, 19 the influence of non-uniform seismic, 20,21 and the seismic response of the connection joints of the cast-in-place utility tunnel. 22 Special seismic excitation is also an important factor affecting the seismic response of the utility tunnel. 23 In some studies, 24,25 the interaction between the utility tunnel and its internal pipeline under seismic excitation was considered to obtain more detailed seismic responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is severe damage on the top of UT and various degrees of fracture in the connection joints between the top slab and the exterior wall, mainly along the Y-direction, as shown in Figure16(C).To compare the differences in the seismic damage of prefabricated utility tunnels and integral cast-in-place utility tunnels, this paper summarizes the test results for integral cast-in-place utility tunnels from results in other literatures and compares them with those of spit-type prefabricated utility tunnels in this test, as shown in Figure17. Based on existing experimental researches,19,22,25,29,45 the vulnerable parts of integral cast-in-place utility tunnels during earthquakes are concentrated at the corners of the internal rectangular sections, and the failure mode is mainly vertical cracks. While the damaged parts of UT in this research are mainly concentrated at the connection joints of adjacent components, and the failure modes are mainly crushing and spalling, which are very different from that of the integral cast-in-place utility tunnel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, a number of experimental and theoretical researches on the horizontal bearing characteristics of piles in silica sand (Guo 2006(Guo , 2013Lin et al 2015;Matlock 1970;Reese et al 1974) and clay (Cecconi et al 2019;Ding et al 2020b;Hong et al 2017;Huang et al 2017) have been conducted, but the data concerning the coral materials is very limited (Dyson and Randolph 2001;Guo and Zhu 2005;Novello 1999;Wesselink et al 1988;Williams et al 1988). Nevertheless, the unique mechanical properties of coral sand have not been taken into account, and the derived load-transfer curves are not cast in a general form that would allow an extension to different conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%