2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shaking table test on seismic responses of a wind turbine tower subjected to pulse-type near-field ground motions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first model is the 1:20 scaled model OWT without counterweight, which is used in this study; the second model is the 1:20 scaled model OWT with counterweight, which accounts for gravity similarity; the third model is the prototype OWT. Since the dimensions of gravitational acceleration and structural acceleration are identical, 28 achieving gravity similarity is equivalent to the acceleration scaling factor of 1:1. The scaling factors derived according to Buckingham's π ‐theorem 52 are listed in Table 2, and the seismic wave is modified according to the similarity theory.…”
Section: Model Design and Test Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first model is the 1:20 scaled model OWT without counterweight, which is used in this study; the second model is the 1:20 scaled model OWT with counterweight, which accounts for gravity similarity; the third model is the prototype OWT. Since the dimensions of gravitational acceleration and structural acceleration are identical, 28 achieving gravity similarity is equivalent to the acceleration scaling factor of 1:1. The scaling factors derived according to Buckingham's π ‐theorem 52 are listed in Table 2, and the seismic wave is modified according to the similarity theory.…”
Section: Model Design and Test Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the existing simplified theories, the hydrodynamic effects during earthquakes may not be well simulated. Despite the prosperous development of shaking table testing of prototype [21][22][23] and model [24][25][26][27][28] wind turbines, studies on the OWTs' seismic performance and hydrodynamic effects are relatively scarce due to the limitations of underwater shaking table technology. Ding et al 29 captured the added mass effect of a bridge pier by underwater shaking table tests; however, the rigid pier had little reference for flexible OWTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the generated equivalent acceleration using Equation (27) will be centralized; that is, the mean will be removed, and thus, the mean of the final equivalent acceleration is zero. 9,18,32,33 Since the wind flow usually comes from on direction, so the equivalent excitation is exerted in the X-direction or Ydirection as shown in Figure 9. According to Equation (26) and principle of frequency similarity of scale model, the similarity ratio of frequency between equivalent acceleration and wind loads can be obtained as 5.…”
Section: Load Cases and Sensor Layoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the average component usually do not trigger vibration of the WTT; thus, only the fluctuating component is involved in this test. Consequently, the generated equivalent acceleration using Equation (27) will be centralized; that is, the mean will be removed, and thus, the mean of the final equivalent acceleration is zero 9,18,32,33 …”
Section: Shaking Table Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar conclusions were drawn by Sigurðsson et al (2020) in their analysis of the effect of pulse-like near-fault ground motions on an 87.6-meter-tall steel wind turbine and by Xu et al (2021) in their collapse analysis of a 65-meter-tall steel wind turbine subjected to ten pulse-like near-fault and ten non-pulse near-fault ground motions. Ren et al (2021) carried out a shaking table test of a 1/20-scaled steel wind turbine excited by two near-fault and two far-field ground motions, showing that the seismic response caused by near-fault ground motions was significantly larger than that caused by far-field ground motions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%