2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-021-7046-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shaking table test for reinforcement of soil slope with multiple sliding surfaces by reinforced double-row anti-slide piles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). An inefficient arching area would arise with the clear spacing (D) considerably more prominent than 8d [21]. D ≤ 5d was suggested as the pile spacing on the reinforced slope to prevent the soil from freely flowing between the piles at these spacing ranges.…”
Section: Slope Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). An inefficient arching area would arise with the clear spacing (D) considerably more prominent than 8d [21]. D ≤ 5d was suggested as the pile spacing on the reinforced slope to prevent the soil from freely flowing between the piles at these spacing ranges.…”
Section: Slope Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new multiobjective comprehensive method for improving the performance of antislide piles has been proposed recently: optimizing slope reinforcement using double piles [16][17][18][19]. The reliability of a pile-slope system has also been observed to be generally determined by representative failure modes, which may vary due to pile length, pile spacing, and pile location [20,21]. By placing piles in two or three rows, the slope stability is enhanced [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And there are more tension cracks on the upper slope. Therefore, the anti-slide pile is usually buried in the middle and lower part of the slope in the actual project [34][35][36]. The anti-slide pile model established in this paper is a rectangular pile with a cross-section size of 2 m × 1.8 m and a length of 25 m. There is no load at the top of the pile, and the top 5 m of the pile body is restrained in the x, y, and z directions.…”
Section: Anti-slide Pile Support Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have utilised foam sheets, particularly on the front and back boundaries of model walls, to address this shortcoming [86][87][88]. In contrast, others have employed glycerin or petroleum jelly to limit the friction between slope material and container walls [89,90]. It is worth noting that the use of mixed container boundaries (a combination of flexible band rigid boundaries) on selected sides poses concerns about the biased orientation of failure plane development and progression which is towards the flexible boundaries [91].…”
Section: Model Containers and Materials Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%