2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00962.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shaking a leg and hot to trot: the effects of body size and temperature on running speed in ants

Abstract: . 1. Data were compiled from the literature and our own studies on 24 ant species to characterise the effects of body size and temperature on forager running speed.2. Running speed increases with temperature in a manner consistent with the effects of temperature on metabolic rate and the kinetic properties of muscles.3. The exponent of the body mass-running speed allometry ranged from 0.14 to 0.34 with a central tendency of approximately 0.25. This body mass scaling is consistent with both the model of elastic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
150
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(61 reference statements)
9
150
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As is the case for all invertebrates, the locomotory rate of ants is known to be highly dependent on ambient temperature (Hurlbert et al, 2008): it generally increases with increasing temperatures. To examine the effect of load ratio on the travel time of loaded ants of different sizes using different transport methods, we thus first regressed travel time on temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is the case for all invertebrates, the locomotory rate of ants is known to be highly dependent on ambient temperature (Hurlbert et al, 2008): it generally increases with increasing temperatures. To examine the effect of load ratio on the travel time of loaded ants of different sizes using different transport methods, we thus first regressed travel time on temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we replace the spring constant with muscle stiffness, we would expect the frequency of oscillatory movements in animals to increase with increasing muscle stiffness and decrease with increasing body mass. Much work on oscillatory movement has shown that body size is often correlated with frequency (Heglund and Taylor, 1988;Young et al, 1992;Lindstedt and Schaeffer, 2002 and references therein; Hurlbert et al, 2008;Sato et al, 2010;Dickerson et al, 2012). The frequency of muscle activation during shivering thermogenesis also seems to be correlated with body mass (Spaan and Klussmann, 1970).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both relative speed (v r ) and stride frequency ( f ) scale negatively with body mass (M b ) (Alexander, 1982;Weyand et al, 2000;IriarteDíaz, 2002;Biewener, 2003;Wu et al, 2010). Dynamic similarity and the length-resonance relationship predict that f∝l −0.5 , where l is leg length, as for a pendulum (Alexander and Jayes, 1983;Biewener, 2003;Hurlbert et al, 2008). Early work showed that this predicted scaling for v r holds true for East African mammals (Pennycuick, 1975), and this was subsequently corroborated for other mammals (Garland, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…More recently, however, Iriarte-Díaz (2002) showed that mammals can be subdivided into smaller species (<30 kg) with a lower v r :M b exponent of −0.09, and larger species with a considerably larger exponent (−0.46). Several factors may account for different exponent values and size-dependent changes in the exponent, including non-isometric scaling of limb length, metabolic power (Schmidt-Nielsen, 1984;Jones and Lindstedt, 1993), and the interaction of metabolic power and dynamic similarity constraints (Hurlbert et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%