2003
DOI: 10.4324/9780203359044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shakespeare's Political Drama

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While he does not explain this connection, Leggatt interprets it as an acknowledgement that kingship can never again be the sacred institution it once was. 124 The highest it can be is an office to achieve worldly glory. In these limited terms, Henry is determined to win the war and "undo the damage his father did."…”
Section: Anirudh Bellementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While he does not explain this connection, Leggatt interprets it as an acknowledgement that kingship can never again be the sacred institution it once was. 124 The highest it can be is an office to achieve worldly glory. In these limited terms, Henry is determined to win the war and "undo the damage his father did."…”
Section: Anirudh Bellementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, he was an affluent businessman who knew how to manage people, market his talent, network with those in power, run his Globe theatre as a profit-churning enterprise. He wrote about leadership not because he had a penchant for the subject but because there was a public demand for it, At a time when the average citizen's ability to participate in public life was limited or non-existent, it was natural that instead of thinking about political structures and functions people would be more inclined to watch the pageantry of greatness, the rise and the fall of the very few who had power (Leggatt 1988).…”
Section: Shakespeare's Biographical Sketchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Richard himself is one of Shakespeare's sharpest studies of a personality. Intensifying the scrutiny of the office, he was bound, it seems, to intensify the scrutiny of the man, and to test man and office against each other (Leggatt 1988). Communications, 9, 2 (2014): 161-184 Corrigan alluding to Shakespeare's denouncement of ascription-oriented power systems states, 'His Richard II is written to appear weak and capricious, demonstrating precisely what happens in the modern world when you just depend on ascribed authority ….'…”
Section: Leggatt Rightly Observesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 See also Bloom with Jaffa 1964; Hume 1873, 357–58; Johnson 1969, 61; Leggatt 1988, 30–31, 90–91; Richmond 1967, 76, 96, 106, 140, 160, 224; Wells 1986, 7, 26–28, 81–85, 152–54, 157, 165. Shakespeare refers to Machiavelli explicitly on three occasions: Henry VI, Part One (V. iv.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%