1985
DOI: 10.2307/2870312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shakespeare in Washington, D.C.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such enhanced abundances may result from the destruction of ice mantles on dust grains and the release of previously depleted CO molecules. Williams (1985) summarizes several mechanisms including the evaporation of the mantles from the energy released in radical reactions on the dust grains, photodesorption by UV radiation triggered by cosmic ray interactions with H2 molecules in the interior of the cloud, and shocks generated from the interaction between dense clumps and stellar winds from young stellar objects. The transition of 13 CO abundances from the UVilluminated envelope to the self-shielded interior are dependent on the physical conditions.…”
Section: Co Abundance Variations Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such enhanced abundances may result from the destruction of ice mantles on dust grains and the release of previously depleted CO molecules. Williams (1985) summarizes several mechanisms including the evaporation of the mantles from the energy released in radical reactions on the dust grains, photodesorption by UV radiation triggered by cosmic ray interactions with H2 molecules in the interior of the cloud, and shocks generated from the interaction between dense clumps and stellar winds from young stellar objects. The transition of 13 CO abundances from the UVilluminated envelope to the self-shielded interior are dependent on the physical conditions.…”
Section: Co Abundance Variations Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because they chose to estimate the upper limit of N(C 18 O) by assuming that T ex (C 18 O) = 0.5 × T ex ( 12 CO). On the basis of the theoretical predictions by Williams (1985) and Charnley et al (1988) (see Sect. 1), these empirical results can be interpreted as a consequence of differing CO-to-H 2 abundance ratios in the star forming and in the quiescent clouds.…”
Section: N(co)/a J Vs Star Formation Activity As Derived From the Samentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is usual to measure the distribution and mass of H 2 in molecular clouds using one canonical N(H 2 ) to N(CO) ratio (see e.g., Sanders et al 1984), where CO here stands for the different isotopes of CO, such as 13 CO and/or C 18 O. However, there is no theoretical reason why there should be one universal N(H 2 )/N(CO) ratio for molecular clouds, even though in most chemical schemes the presence of H 2 is important for effective production of CO (Williams 1985). Instead, according to Williams, the ratio may vary from cloud to cloud and even within a cloud.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, heating due to radiation and schocks in the vicinity of vigorous star formation should alter the level of depletion (e.g. Williams 1985;Charnley et al 1988). Williams (1985) concludes that variations can occur from cloud to cloud, and even within the different regions of the same cloud reflecting the local star formation activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%