2002
DOI: 10.1080/02688690220148978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shaken Baby Syndrome: fundamental questions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is suggested to be due to microscopic vascularised membranes encasing old SDHs (Uscinski 2002). The contention is that birth-related subdurals resolve, leaving subdural membranes which could be vulnerable to rebleeding after later minor trauma or from later hypoxia.…”
Section: Asymptomatic Newborn Subdural Haemorrhagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is suggested to be due to microscopic vascularised membranes encasing old SDHs (Uscinski 2002). The contention is that birth-related subdurals resolve, leaving subdural membranes which could be vulnerable to rebleeding after later minor trauma or from later hypoxia.…”
Section: Asymptomatic Newborn Subdural Haemorrhagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was not until 2002 when a researcher by the name of Uscinski completed a retrospective analysis of Ommaya's study and confirmed these results can be applied to injuries suffered in SBS. He formulated his confirmation by applying the principles of Newtonian physics to Ommaya's study (Uscinski 2002). …”
Section: Physical Manifestationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shaken baby syndrome (or shaken impact syndrome) is a hypothetical condition, albeit believed in by some with a religious passion. In the hurly-burly of full-time paediatric neurological practice I used to believe in it myself; however, within the past two years publications from several centres have critically questioned the assumptions underlying the concept and the diagnosis [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] . If the purpose of the conference is scientific enquiry and rational discourse, it is surprising that the authors of these publications are entirely absent from the list of invited speakers.…”
Section: Pooled Waiting Listsmentioning
confidence: 99%