2021
DOI: 10.3390/su132212868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shadow of Your Former Self: Exploring Project Leaders’ Post-Failure Behaviors (Resilience, Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy) in High-Tech Startup Projects

Abstract: Globally, demands for sustainable strategies in the ICT industry have attracted greater momentum as high-tech projects continue to fail in large numbers. Recent studies have underpinned project resilience as a major factor for overcoming these increasing project failures, delays, or termination. However, the complex behaviors of resilient project leaders, especially in post-failure conditions, have been largely overlooked. To address this critical research gap, the present study identifies the direct relations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Courtesy of its easy-to-understand path analysis, SEM lets the researchers examine a combination of interrelated research questions systematically and inclusively ( Anderson and Gerbing, 1988 ). An increasing number of studies in the areas of supply chain management, human resource management, marketing, tourism, accounting, and strategic management are employing SEM to good effect ( Hair et al, 2017 ; Zaman et al, 2021a ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Courtesy of its easy-to-understand path analysis, SEM lets the researchers examine a combination of interrelated research questions systematically and inclusively ( Anderson and Gerbing, 1988 ). An increasing number of studies in the areas of supply chain management, human resource management, marketing, tourism, accounting, and strategic management are employing SEM to good effect ( Hair et al, 2017 ; Zaman et al, 2021a ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, project success has continued to receive significant attention in major studies that introduce various elements in the project success framework ( Khan and Rasheed, 2015 ; Aga et al, 2016 ; Musawir et al, 2017 ; Wu et al, 2017 ; Zaman et al, 2022c ). The increasing attempts to fill gaps in project management research that bring improvements to how projects are managed today ( Zaman et al, 2021a ); still, there has never been an examination of project success from the perspective of project management innovation ( Musawir et al, 2017 ; Zaman et al, 2022c ). There is widespread international evidence that persistently supports the dynamic capabilities of management innovation in achieving successful organizational outcomes ( Millar et al, 2018 ; Hassi, 2019 ; Khosravi et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practitioners and researchers have been working on improving project performance by enhancing teamwork and focusing on improving project management tools (Besner and Hobbs, 2012; Hebert and Deckro, 2011; Mir and Pinnington, 2014). The relevant literature in the last 4 decades sees project success as a combined achievement of objective and subjective measures which have been set in order to demonstrate the success criteria, and through which the success of the project is measured at the end (Joslin and Müller, 2016; Zaman et al. , 2021a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the project success rate has still not improved, as the high scale of project failures (e.g. 66% failure rate in IT based projects) roughly costs $109 million for every $1 billion of project-based investment (McManus and Wood-Harper, 2008; Joslin and Müller, 2016; Zaman et al. , 2021a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation